Co-incineration in Cimpor and Secil cement kilns, Portugal

Air pollution and high rates of cancer found around cement plants burning waste for powering the industry. Protests in several places in portugal since the '90s


Description
In 1986, just after joining the European Community, Portugal changed its waste treatment policy: the government chose to install co-incineration technology based on the Directive 94/67/CE, instead of building an incineration plant in Estarreja. In 1996, the creation of the Institute for Waste (part of the Portuguese Environmental Agency) began to define the strategy towards industrial waste (hazardous and non-hazardous) and urban waste and its relation with the wastes from the health sector too. The priority was the "valorization" of industrial waste as fuel or raw material, therefore the use of waste in cement kilns became a perfect solution: it led to the use of less fuels use for cement production and allowed the re-use of dangerous wastes. Some waste needs a pre-treatment to be applied in this process and, in this case, the cement kiln must be adapted.
See more...
Basic Data
NameCo-incineration in Cimpor and Secil cement kilns, Portugal
CountryPortugal
ProvinceCoimbra, Beira Baixa
SiteSouselas (Maceira, Alhandra e Outão)
Accuracy of LocationMEDIUM regional level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Waste Management
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Landfills, toxic waste treatment, uncontrolled dump sites
Incinerators
Specific CommoditiesCement
Industrial waste
Domestic municipal waste
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsThe cement factories with co-incineration technology in Portugal are Secil (Outão) and Cimpor (Souselas) and Secil/CMP (Maceira Liz). Scoreco's conducted a study that calculated that 16.000 tons of waste per year would be available for co-incineration.
Type of PopulationSemi-urban
Potential Affected Population4000
Start Date1998
Company Names or State EnterprisesSuez Lyonnaise des Eaux (Suez) from France - Waste management company
Secil (Secil) from Portugal - Concession holder
Cimpor (Cimpor) from Portugal - Concession holder
Relevant government actorsLocal municipal authorities
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersADAS - Associação de Defesa do Ambiente de Souselas, Pro Urbe – Associação Cívica de Coimbra, Comissão de Luta Contra a Co-incineração (CLCC) , Quercus Coimbra, Greenpeace
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)LATENT (no visible organising at the moment)
When did the mobilization beginPREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups MobilizingInternational ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of MobilizationBoycotts of official procedures/non-participation in official processes
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Noise pollution
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Soil contamination, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Desertification/Drought, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover
OtherThe cement production is a process that generate a lot of air and soil pollution mainly and noise pollution too.
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Other environmental related diseases
Potential: Deaths, Occupational disease and accidents, Accidents
OtherThe epidemiological study in Souselas reportedly shows that the local community have more tumors and respiratory disease then other commuties in Center Portugal.
Socio-economic ImpactsPotential: Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCompensation
Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Negotiated alternative solution
Strengthening of participation
Application of existing regulations
Project temporarily suspended
Development of AlternativesRecycling of waste and contaminated oils
Do you consider this as a success?Not Sure
Why? Explain briefly.The co-incineration plan was initially cancelled because of local protests and because the EU was building a new strategy for waste management. However, nowadays waste is burned in the cement kilns of Maceira and Outão (owned by Secil) and Alhandra (owned by Cimpor), but the conflicts is now less intense.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on waste incineration plants and waste co-incineration plants
European Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC)
Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU)
Best Available Techniques (BAT, decision 2013/163/EU). This last document names the use of alternative materials as a BAT procedure for the cement industry.

European Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC)
[click to view]

Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU)
[click to view]

Best Available Techniques (BAT, decision 2013/163/EU).
Use of alternative materials as a BAT procedure for the cement industry.
[click to view]

References

BRANCO, Manuel, C.P. To be seen but not to be heard: scientific rationality versus democratic rationality in the decision–making process on dangerous waste management in Portugal. Universidade de Évora: Departamento de Economia, Tese de Doutorado, Jul. 2006.
[click to view]

JERÓNIMO, Helena M.; GARCIA, José L. Risks, alternative knowledge strategies and democratic legitimacy: the conflict over co–incineration of hazardous industrial waste in Portugal. Journal of Risk Research, Jun. 2011.
[click to view]

MATIAS, Marisa. Don´t treat us like dirt: the fight against the co – incineration of dangerous industrial waste in the outskirts of Coimbra. South European Society and Politics, v. 9, n. 2, p. 132-158, 2004.
[click to view]

KIKUCHI, R.; GERARD, R. More than a decade of conflict between hazardous waste management and public resistance: a case study of NIMBY syndrome in Souselas (Portugal). Journal Hazard Materials, Dez. 2009.
[click to view]

NUNES, João Arriscado Nunes; MATIAS, Marisa, Controvérsia científica e conflitos ambientais em Portugal: O caso da co‑incineração de resíduos industriais perigosos, Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociais, 2003.
[click to view]

Links

Cement industry discourse . Interesting to see the positive view that they share about the process and how they are excited to "deliver a valuable contribution to environmentally sound waste management".
[click to view]

Report of 2006 against co-incineration in cement factories in Brazil and Portugal
[click to view]

Recent complaints, 2014
[click to view]

Article in "Não nos lixem"
[click to view]

Media Links

Video TVI. 2009-12-08. Souselas: Co-incineração pode ser retomada
[click to view]

Co-incineration suspended in Souselas, 2009.
[click to view]

Co-incineration in Souselas: subject re-opened
[click to view]

Co-incineration in Arrábida
[click to view]

Other Documents

Respiratory diseases - Souselas and Maceira Liz communities Data from a epidemiological study
[click to view]

Tumors -Souselas and Maceira Liz communities Data from an epidemiological study
[click to view]

Working paper Análise de um processo decisório controverso: a co-incineração em Souselas (portuguese)
[click to view]

ICS Report (portuguese)
[click to view]

Epidemiological public presentation
[click to view]

[click to view]

Other CommentsSouselas was the place was the strugles were stronger. Other GPS: 39.917853, -8.217043 (Outão); 39.686703, -8.884192 (Maceira)
Meta Information
Contributor Lays Silva, Lúcia Fernandes and Teresa Meira
Last update16/03/2015
Comments