Sri Nakarin Dam National Park and Chalerm Rattanakosin Forest Reserves, Kanchanaburi, Thailand

An agreement was made between the community members and park officials so that villagers could continue to cultivate and extract resources in the protected areas.


Description
This conflict regarding the establishment of the Sri Nakarin Dam National Park and the Chalerm Rattanakosin Forest Reserves, located in Kanchanaburi Province, is a case of conflict that arose between customary and statutory claims over forest resources, as well as between global conservation trends and local livelihood goals [1]
See more...
Basic Data
NameSri Nakarin Dam National Park and Chalerm Rattanakosin Forest Reserves, Kanchanaburi, Thailand
CountryThailand
ProvinceKanchanaburi
SiteTeen Tok village
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Biodiversity conservation conflicts
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Establishment of reserves/national parks
Land acquisition conflicts
Specific CommoditiesLand
Biological resources
Timber
Project Details and Actors
Project Details
In 1981, the government designated two protect areas: the Sri Nakarin Dam National Park and the Charlem Rattanakosin Forest Reserves. Both the national park and forest reserve overlapped with the Teen Tok village lands.
See more...
Project Area (in hectares)153,200 + 5,900 (both parks)
Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Population1,129 persons (252 households)
Start Date01/01/1981
End Date2006
Relevant government actorsThai government
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersSueb Nasakhathien Foundation
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Fishermen
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Karen Po ethnic minority
Forms of MobilizationBoycotts of official procedures/non-participation in official processes
Development of alternative proposals
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Land occupation
Community members trapped forestry officers in the village without food or water
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Food insecurity (crop damage)
Health ImpactsVisible: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide
Potential: Malnutrition
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Land dispossession, Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Other socio-economic impacts, Increase in violence and crime, Militarization and increased police presence
Potential: Loss of landscape/sense of place, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures
OtherVillagers' collection activities became illegal and therefore they were considered forest thieves
Outcome
Project StatusStopped
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseNegotiated alternative solution
Dialogue between community members and park officials through the mediation of a local NGO; a joint management solution that allows villagers moderate resource use in the protected areas
Application of existing regulations
Criminalization of activists
Repression
Strengthening of participation
Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area
Institutional changes
Land demarcation
Development of AlternativesThe local NGO served as a mediator to solve the conflict in 2004. That was a part of the Joint Management of Protected Area (JoMPA). The JoMPA aims at different objectives: (i)building mutual understanding between local people and national park officials by regular meeting, (ii)marking forest areas for villagers' use within the boudaries of two protected areas to allow collection of non-timber forest products, (iii)informing the boundary checks in advance; (iv)creating regulations for managing and monitoring activities within the protected areas.
Do you consider this as a success?Yes
Why? Explain briefly.An agreement was made between the community members and park officials so that villagers could continue to cultivate and extract resources in the protected areas. Teen Tok's Forest Conservation Network was extended to neighbouring villages and the Forest Protection Volunteer Network was established in 2008 with the participation of five more villages in the area.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

Thailand National Park Act of 1961
[click to view]

References

Yasmi, Y, Kelley, L., Muriyarso, D., Patel, T. (2012) The struggle over Asia's forests: an overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+, International Forestry Review, 14(1): 99-109.

[1] Rawee Thaworn, Lisa Kelly, Yurdi Yasmi, Can biodiversity conservation go hand in hand with local livelihoods: A case of conflict resolution in Thailand.
[click to view]

Links

[2] kachanaburi info.com
[click to view]

Other Documents

Livelihood activities in the national parks Source: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1758e/i1758e08.pdf
[click to view]

Document showing fines for villagers and land confiscation Source: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1758e/i1758e08.pdf
[click to view]

Villagers living in the national park prior to its establishment Source: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1758e/i1758e08.pdf
[click to view]

Meta Information
ContributorHao Phan, School of International Development, University of East Anglia, h.phan@uea.ac.uk
Last update09/07/2015
Comments