Krsko Nuclear Power Plant, Slovenia


Description

The construction of Krško NPP started in year 1975 and was concluded in 1981. During 1982 numerous test were performed and in January 1983 Krško NPP started with commercial production. One year later regular operation of Krško NPP was approved. Introduction of nuclear energy was a great challenge for involved scientific and technical experts, legislators, and all domestic companies acting either as contractors or subcontractors.

See more...
Basic Data
NameKrsko Nuclear Power Plant, Slovenia
CountrySlovenia
SiteKrsko
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Nuclear
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Nuclear power plants
Specific CommoditiesUranium
Electricity
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsNEK is equipped with a Westinghouse Pressurised Light Water Reactor of 2.000 MW thermal power. The power plants net electrical power is 696 MW. It is connected to the 400kV grid supplying power to consumer centres in Slovenia and Croatia. The total installed output of the power stations is 2.834 MW, from which represents slo share of npp Krško 14% (384 MW of 696 MW total power).

Expected lifetime of NEK is 40 years, with activities fot its extension for another 20 years.

In 2011, the Krško NPP produced 6,214,748.0 MWh (6.2 TWh) gross electrical energy on the output of the generator, which corresponds to 5,902,238.8 MWh net electrical energy delivered to the grid.
Project Area (in hectares)10
Type of PopulationSemi-urban
Potential Affected Population2,200
Company Names or State EnterprisesNEK Ltd from Slovenia - which is owned 50 % by GEN energija Ltd. (Slovenia)
GEN energija Ltd. from Slovenia
Hrvatska Elektroprivreda (HEP Grupa) from Croatia
Relevant government actors(ARAO)- Agency for Radioactive Waste Management, Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersFocus, Greenpeace and Združenje ekoloških gibanj - ZEG
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)LATENT (no visible organising at the moment)
When did the mobilization beginPREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups MobilizingLocal ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of MobilizationCreation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Media based activism/alternative media
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Genetic contamination, Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Oil spills, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…)
Potential: Accidents, Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Occupational disease and accidents, Deaths, Other environmental related diseases
Socio-economic ImpactsPotential: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCorruption
Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area
Institutional changes
Negotiated alternative solution
New legislation
Strengthening of participation
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Development of Alternatives0
Do you consider this as a success?No
Why? Explain briefly.The lifetime of the current reactor is prologned by 50 % (20 years) without performing EIA, which would be in line with the ESPOO convention. Another reactor is planned to be constructed and is included in the development plans of Slovenia. No permanent site is selected for LILW storage (currently, LILW is stored at the reactor). The whole site (current reactor, storage and planned reactor) is located in a seizmically active area).
Sources and Materials
Legislations

Decree on checking the radioactivity for shipments of metal scrap (Off. Gat. RS, 84/07),

Regulation on the monitoring of radioactivity (Off. Gaz. RS, 20/07)

Slovenian legislation relating to nuclear safety and radiation protection is comprehensive and in line withinternational standards. In the strictest sense of the practical application of the area regulated by the Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (ZVISJV14). In its legislation, Slovenia has transferred the basic standards of the International Agency forAtomic Energy. Wider field of nuclear and radiation safety is regulated by legislation on responsibility for nuclear damage, exports of dual-use items (ie, that could be used to make nuclear weapons), the transport of dangerous goods, regulations that govern the operation of utilities for radioactive waste management, the fund for the decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plant and disposal of radioactive waste from nuclear power plant, the permanent cessation of exploitation of uranium and prevention of the effects of mine uranium mine, physical security regulations in the field of protection and rescue, etc..

The most important legal instrument in the area of nuclear and radiation safety in the Republic of Slovenia is the Act on Protection against Ionizing Radiation and Nuclear Safety (ZVISJV, Off. Gaz.RS,102/04 – official consolidated text). Based on the ZVISJV, twenty-one implementing regulations were adopted at the beginning of 2007, namely four governmental decrees, six regulations issued by the minister of the environment, nine issued by the minister of health and two issued by the minister of the interior. In 2007 the adoption of implementing regulations continued and the following regulations were issued:

References

Jancar-Webster B (1993) Environmental Action in Eastern Europe: Responses to Crisis. Armonck, NY: M. E. Sharpe

Links

Agencija za radioaktivne odpadke (Slovenian)
[click to view]

Institut Jozef Stefan (Slovenian)
[click to view]

Nuklearna elektrarna Krsko - Krsko Nuclear Power Plant
[click to view]

Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration (Slovenian)
[click to view]

[click to view]

International Atomic Energy Agency
[click to view]

OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
[click to view]

Sklad NEK (Slovenian)

Other Documents

the nuclear plant Source: http://www.sloveniatimes.com/nuclear-safety-exercise-in-krsko-power-plant
[click to view]

Other CommentsDirectly Affected People: Around 2200 people in 10 km radius
Meta Information
Last update06/04/2017
Comments