Kusum Tola, India

Description

The general conflict is about the widespread rapid development of open cast coal mining in the North Karanpura Valley in Hazaribagh and Chatra districts of Jharkhand. This specific case is about the village Kusum Tola (Chatra district) where the coal mine Purnadih threatens the livelihood of about 1000 subsistence indigenous peasants (Adivasis) and their cultural heritage as they have to leave their villages to make way for the coal mine. The coal mine was officially opened on 21 August 2009 and since then, blastings have been heard and felt. The hamlets of Dembua and Baseriya have already been dismantled and the villagers of Kusum Tola are supposed to leave next. There have already been at least 2 demonstrations against the land acquisitions - one in 2009 for stopping mining as it is polluting the water reserves of Kusum Tola and one in 2010 to protest against the blasting. The protests have been organized mainly by a Village Struggle Committee (young activist Suresh Oraon being in the forefront), consisting of more than 25 young villagers. Furthermore, local and international NGOs have engaged in the struggle. It is also noteworthy that the mining area is located in the Red Corridor, a 5 state area where the Indian government has been fighting against the Naxilites (Maoists) in the socalled Operation Green Hunt since 2009. Adivasis and concerned activists are often accused of taking part in the communist insurgency.

See more...
Basic Data
NameKusum Tola, India
CountryIndia
ProvinceJharkhand
SiteChatra district
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Deforestation
Tailings from mines
Coal extraction and processing
Specific CommoditiesCoal
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsThe Purnadih Mine that is currently threatening the villagers of Kusum Tola is one of several mines in the North Karanpura Valley (North Karanpura Coalfields). They will ultimately destroy over 1,100 sqkm of land and forest. A mine producing 40 million tonnes of coal in its lifetime (about 15 years) devastates about 25 sqkm in area.

Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Population4500 people
Start Date2009
Company Names or State EnterprisesCentral Coalfields Limited (CCL) from India - State enterprise
Relevant government actorsCentral Coalfields Limited
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersCASS - Chotanagpur Adivasi Seva Samiti (India), INTACH - Indian National Trust For Art and Cultural Heritage (India), FIAN - Food First Information and Action Network (International), JMACC - Jharkhand Mines Areas Coordination Committee (India), BIRSA - Bindrai Institute for Research Study and Action (India)
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingIndigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Women
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Forms of MobilizationCreation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Official complaint letters and petitions
Street protest/marches
Arguments for the rights of mother nature
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Mine tailing spills
Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Health ImpactsVisible: Occupational disease and accidents
Potential: Malnutrition, Infectious diseases
Otherhealth problems and reduced life span due to disease caused by inhalation of mine dust
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Specific impacts on women, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment
Outcome
Project StatusUnder construction
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCompensation
Criminalization of activists
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Development of AlternativesFirst of all, the villagers demand the right to stay on their lands and live in peace. The support groups request the government to halt mining until up to date EIAs and SIAs have been done (these are missing so far or outdated). They furthermore request the company CCL to adequately compensate all the villagers that have been evicted so far. The transnational support network calls for the publication of this carbon generating programme in the context of global warming.
Do you consider this as a success?No
Why? Explain briefly.The expansion of coal mining could not be prevented, at most only delayed.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

National Legislation:

Right to Information Act, 2005

The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act, 2008, Sections 3,4,5

Biological Diversity Act, 2002, Section 36

International legislation:

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966, Art. 11

United Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Art. 8,10,26,29,31,32

References

sarini (2010): Karanpura Valley TurnOver. Draft Version. In: [16.7.2012]
[click to view]

Links

[click to view]

Meta Information
ContributorMelanie Pichler
Last update08/04/2014
Comments