Mechanized Sand Mining in the Maha Oya, Sri Lanka

Maha Oya river is one of the main sources of sand for the increasing needs in construction materials by Sri Lanka. River sand mining has high environmental and social impacts. Local EJOs succeeded in forcing the government in regulating the activity.

<div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Description</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld"></td><td class="columns"> Maha Oya is one of the largest rivers in Sri Lanka. More than 1.1 million people live in the area, harnessing myriad of benefits from the river that provides water for domestic and industrial needs and is at the basis of subsistence and livelihood activities of local communities. Hence, continuous river flow and good health of the riverine environment is of vital importance in terms of socio-economic and environmental aspects. Since the 1970s, the Maha Oya is one of the most popular sources of high quality river sand in Sri Lanka. Over the time, due to the free economic policies and the construction boom the pressure on the river as sand provider has dramatically increased. Therefore, since the late 1980s, the sand mining in the Maha Oya and clay mining in the hinterland have been exacerbating, giving rise to a number of environmental and socio-economic problems. Excessive sand mining activities in the Maha Oya cause reduction of sand supply to the coastline, breaking the natural sand equilibrium of the beaches. The indiscriminate sand extraction from the river leads to lack of sand availability for replenishing the beaches which are naturally washed away by the wave action. The coastal stretch from Negombo to Chilaw has been identified as the most eroded coastline in Sri Lanka by the Coastal Zone Management Plan in 2006, of which 80-85% of the degradation is attributed to exacerbate sand mining in the Maha Oya. At certain places such as Katuneriya and Lansiagama, the erosion rate is 12-15m/year. Due to the coastal erosion in Wennappuwa and Nattandiya DS divisions, over 1,000 of families lost their properties over the span of a 20 year period giving rise to a number of adverse impacts including loss of homes and other properties, and loss of livelihoods. Some of these displaced communities have been living in temporarily built sheds for nearly 3 years since 2009. By the Maha Oya River there are more than 1,000 people engaged in traditional mining activities. Due to the sharp increase of sand price during the last decade, today there are many business groups interested in such profitable activity. Following the Environmental Foundation Limited, these business groups carry out illegal mining using heavy mechanical equipment. Mechanical River Sand Mining (RSM) in the Maha Oya has been completely banned since 2004 because it causes more damage to the riverine environment than traditional artisan mining and because the extraction rate of the sand is far higher than that of artisan mining causing bank erosion and depletion of sand deposits. The banning of Mechanical RSM is the outcome of a conflict involving the local communities engaged in traditional sand mining against the mentioned business groups. Tensions within communities occurred as the benefits of RSM were passed on to private players engaging in the sand mining business and to urban communities who enjoyed the benefit of better infrastructure. Local communities had to manage the negative impacts of extractions for which they were not compensated in any way. This led the communities living along Maha Oya to file Public Interest Litigation (PIL) with the legal support of the Environmental Foundation Ltd. (EFL). As a result of the PIL, sand mining was completely banned. The court also demanded periodic reports from the police to ensure progress was made. In addition to this positive outcome, two local organizations, SLWP (Sri Lanka Water Partnership) and NetWwater (Network of Women Water Professionals) launched a campaign against illegal sand mining in 2005. Therefore the legal efforts to confront the practice of indiscriminate sand mining have been accompanied by SLWP creating awareness and further mobilising communities to take concerted action. As a result, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources issued a 'Draft National Policy on Sand as a Resource for the Construction Industry' in 2005. [1][2][3]</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Basic Data</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Name</td><td>Mechanized Sand Mining in the Maha Oya, Sri Lanka</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Country</td><td><a href="/country/sri-lanka">Sri Lanka</a></td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Province</td><td>Western Province</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Site</td><td>Katana</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Accuracy of Location</td><td>MEDIUM regional level</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Source of Conflict</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Type of Conflict (1st level)</td><td>Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Type of Conflict (2nd level)</td><td>Building materials extraction (quarries, sand, gravel)</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Specific Commodities</td><td><a href='/commodity/sand-gravel'>Sand, gravel</a></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Project Details and Actors</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Project Details</td><td class="columns"><div class="less">The annual sand requirement of the country is nearly 8.5 million cubes in year as recorded in 2010 with an increase of 5-10% per annum [1].</div><a class="seemore" href="#">See more...</a><div class="more" style="display:none">The coastal stretch from Negombo to Chilaw has been identified as the most eroded coastline in Sri Lanka by the Coastal Zone Management Plan in 2006, of which 80-85% of the degradation is attributed to exacerbate sand mining in the Maha Oya. At certain places such as Katuneriya and Lansiagama, the erosion rate is 12-15m/year [1].<br/><br/><a class="seeless" href="#">(See less)</a></div></td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Level of Investment (in USD)</td><td>unknown </td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Type of Population</td><td>Rural</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Start Date</td><td>01/01/2004</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">End Date</td><td>08/05/2015</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Relevant government actors</td><td>Central Environmental Authority (CEA)<br/><br/>Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (GSMB)<br/><br/>Relevant Divisional Secretariats</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Environmental justice organisations and other supporters</td><td>Environmental Foundation Limited<br/><br/>NetWwater (Network of Women Water Professionals)<br/><br/>SLWP (Sri Lanka Water Partnership)<br/><br/>ELAW</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">The Conflict and the Mobilization</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)</td><td>MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">When did the mobilization begin</td><td>In REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Groups Mobilizing</td><td>Artisanal miners<br /> Farmers<br /> Fishermen<br /> Informal workers<br /> International ejos<br /> Local ejos<br /> Social movements<br /> Women<br /> Local scientists/professionals<br /> Religious groups</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Forms of Mobilization</td><td>Development of a network/collective action<br /> Involvement of national and international NGOs<br /> Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism<br /> Official complaint letters and petitions</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Impacts</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Environmental Impacts</td><td><strong>Visible: </strong>Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil erosion<br /><strong>Potential: </strong>Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Other</td><td>Sea erosion is another significant secondary effect due to insufficient sediment flow through the rivers. In particular, concerns are raised about the increasing damage to drinking water sources, loss and damage to irrigation systems and agricultural lands and spread of vector borne diseases by providing the breeding grounds for mosquitoes [2].</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Socio-economic Impacts</td><td><strong>Visible: </strong>Loss of landscape/sense of place<br /><strong>Potential: </strong>Displacement, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Land dispossession</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Other</td><td>Lowering of the water table causing problems in water accessibility<br/><br/>Salinity intrusion to the river and other fresh water systems due to lowered river bed and water table<br/><br/>Loss of biodiversity and associated impacts on tourism and recreational value of the river<br/><br/>Impacts on the livelihoods and subsistence of the communities [1].<br/><br/>Uncontrolled sand mining has caused destruction to the natural morphology of many rivers, which had instigated structural problems to structures across the rivers such as bridges, barrages and fresh water intakes [2].<br/><br/>Portable water supplies to heavily populate coastal belt including capital city Colombo is supplied by the water drawn from the main rivers. Locations of these intakes have been designed carefully after studying the profile of the river, low flow conditions and the change of tidal levels. When most of these intakes were located few decades back it was not anticipated the river beds would lower to the levels now prevail. With the current levels of river beds that had been unexpectedly lowered, sea water intrusion along the river has become a permanent threat to water quality and quantity. It has now become necessary to change the location of intake in some water supply schemes. Replacement of a water supply intake may cost SL Rs 20 million (for new facilities) while the original investment has now become defunct [2]. </td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Outcome</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Project Status</td><td>Stopped</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Pathways for conflict outcome / response</td><td>Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area<br /> Court decision (victory for environmental justice)<br /> New legislation</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Development of Alternatives</td><td>Local EJOs ask the application of the local regulations by local authorities.<br/><br/>Communities defend artisan mining practices, which have much lower impacts.</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Do you consider this as a success?</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Why? Explain briefly.</td><td>Mechanized sand mining was prohibited under the National Environmental Act 47 1980 by Gazette notification No. 1454/4 – 17 July, 2006. <br/><br/>Areas such as 100m from the Jambugaswatte area and 2km of both sides of Kochchikade main bridge were declared environmentally sensitive areas of the river and were protected.<br/><br/>In 2015, the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau drafted the Management Plan for Maha Oya with the participation of wider stakeholders along the river. The ongoing Maha Oya River Management Plan is expected to regularise mining activities, restore degraded areas, monitor illegal mining and effluent discharges whilst harvesting river sand in a sustainable manner.</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Sources and Materials</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Legislations</td><td><table><tr><td><p> Mines and Minerals Act No.33 of 1992 as amended in 2009<br/></p></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Links</td><td><table><tr><td><p> [1] Report by: Environmental Foundation Ltd., MAHA OYA UNDER THREAT. 2016, Sri Lanka. (Accessed 14/08/2016)<br/><a class="refanch small" href="" target="_blank">[click to view]</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> [2] Report by: B. Kamaladasa, Issues and challenges in river management due to excessive sand<br />mining. Irrigation Department of Sri Lanka Colombo (Accessed 14/08/2016)<br/><a class="refanch small" href="" target="_blank">[click to view]</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> [3] Report by: Water Integrity In Action, Curbing Illegal Sand Mining in Sri Lanka. 2013 (Accessed 14/08/2016)<br/><a class="refanch small" href="" target="_blank">[click to view]</a></p></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Other Documents</td><td><table><tr><td><p><strong>River sand mining in Maha Oya. Source: Environmental Foundation Ltd.</strong> <br/><a class="refanch small" href="" target="_blank">[click to view]</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Eroded river bank of the Maha-Oya, 2011. Source: Environmental Foundation Ltd.</strong> <br/><a class="refanch small" href="" target="_blank">[click to view]</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>A map of mined pits along the downstream of the Maha Oya. Source: Environmental Foundation Ltd.</strong> <br/><a class="refanch small" href="" target="_blank">[click to view]</a></p></td></tr></table></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div class="horipane"><div class="title active">Meta Information</div><div class="content"><table class="table"><tbody><tr><td class="fld">Contributor</td><td>Environmental Foundation Limited and EJAtlas collaborator Paola Camisani</td></tr><tr><td class="fld">Last update</td><td>16/08/2016</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div>