Mining Project at Marlapadu village, India

Description

The Government of Andhra Pradesh reserved low grade Iron Ore deposit areas in Konijedu, Marlapadu villages in Prakasam District over an extent of 3,143 acres for exploitation in public sector.

See more...
Basic Data
NameMining Project at Marlapadu village, India
CountryIndia
ProvinceAndhra Pradesh
SitePrakasam
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Mineral ore exploration
Specific Commodities
Iron ore
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsThe annual capacity of the proposed venture is 5 lakh MTs and the expected revenue is Rs. 2.25 crores per annum @ Rs. 45 / MT of concentrate produced. This project would generate employment for 500 to 800 people. This project involves investment of Rs. 150 to Rs. 175 crores.

Project Area (in hectares)530
Level of Investment (in USD)30000000
Type of PopulationRural
Start Date17/11/2012
Company Names or State EnterprisesAndhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation (APMDC) from India
M/s. Gimpex Ltd. from India
Relevant government actorsAndhra Pradesh Government, Pollution Control Board, Prakasam District Collector
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
When did the mobilization beginPREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of MobilizationBlockades
Boycotts of official procedures/non-participation in official processes
Property damage/arson
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Mine tailing spills
Health ImpactsPotential: Other environmental related diseases
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Land dispossession
Potential: Displacement, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood
Outcome
Project StatusPlanned (decision to go ahead eg EIA undertaken, etc)
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseViolent targeting of activists
Do you consider this as a success?Not Sure
Why? Explain briefly.Villagers are against the establishment of the mining in the area. They claim that a canal that is supplying drinking water to the villages, would get polluted and would also cause air and noise pollution in the area. Also locals are not assured about the getting employment at the mining or plant.
Sources and Materials
References

new 2.html
[click to view]

Exploitation of low grade iron ore in Prakasam District

Links

(1)Villagers clash with police over mining project
[click to view]

Business Line, APMDC, Chennai co to tap iron ore in Prakasam district
[click to view]

Villagers clash with police in Prakasam district of AP over iron or mining plans by Gympex
[click to view]

The Hindu, Villagers boycott public hearing on mining
[click to view]

Meta Information
ContributorSwapan Kumar Patra
Last update08/04/2014
Comments