Nenskra hydropower project, Georgia

Resistance against a EBRD funded dam in Georgia’s northern Svaneti region has caused locals to restore the traditional ruling body lalkhor in order to increase the community’s impact on the national decision-making process


Description

The Nenskra hydropower plant is a dam project of 280 MW and considered a the most advanced of Georgia's massive plans for hydropower installations in the Upper Svaneti region. The project is located on the river Nenskra, up stream to the Khudoni dam. On Monday, August 31, 2015, the Partnership Fund of Georgia and South Korea’s K-Water company executed the key project agreements to develop and construct the 280 MW hydropower plant under the BOT scheme (Build-Operate-Transfer). Apart from serving the national demand, the project might also export electricity to Turkey [5]. According to Bankwatch, as has been the practice with other hydropower projects in Georgia, the Nenskra implementation agreement signed in August 2015 is confidential, so many details about land appropriation and tariffs are unknown.

See more...
Basic Data
NameNenskra hydropower project, Georgia
CountryGeorgia
ProvinceUpper Svaneti region
Accuracy of LocationMEDIUM regional level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Water Management
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Dams and water distribution conflicts
Land acquisition conflicts
Deforestation
Specific CommoditiesElectricity
Water
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsThe project consists of a dam, pressure tunnel, surge tank, penstock and powerhouse. Additionally a transfer tunnel will convey the water from Nakra river to the new Nenskra dam reservoir to improve the performance of the Project. An asphalt faced rockfill dam (AFRD) has been selected considering the site conditions in the Nenskra river basin. The peculiarity of the structure is the 65 m deep Cut-Off wall to be realized throughout the alluvial deposit on the river bed.

The other main ancillary structures to the dam are:

The Bottom Outlet structure (tunnel with gate shaft)

The Spillway Structure (tunnel with lateral over flow structure and unlined plunge pool)

The project is capable of providing on average total energy generation of 1219 GWh/y, 259,2 GWh of guaranteed supply in the winter months and maximizes export benefits in the summer months. The power will be distributed through a 220 kV transmission line to Akhari-Jvari substation. [retrieved from Salini Impregilo website]
Level of Investment (in USD)1,000,000,000 (total amount)
Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Population300 families live in Chuberi and 80 families in the village of Nakra.
Start Date2015
Company Names or State EnterprisesSalini-Impregilo from Italy
JSC Nenskra Hydro consortium from Georgia
Korea Water Resources Corporation (K-water) from Republic of Korea
International and Financial InstitutionsInternational Finance Corporation (IFC)
Asian Development Bank (ADB)
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (ERBD) - The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has agreed to provide US$200 million for Georgia's 280-MW Nenskra hydropower plant.
Export-Import Bank of Korea (banking, finance, investment) from Republic of Korea
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersLocal activists organized at village level

Green Fist and Young Greens http://www.fyeg.org/

Bankwatch http://bankwatch.org/

Green Alternative
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Religious groups
Forms of MobilizationBlockades
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
OtherGiven the scale of existing and new hydro developments and supporting infrastructure projects (bypass and access roads, additional high voltage transmission lines and substations and so on), a strategic environmental assessment of the existing and planned plants should be conducted to evaluate the impacts and avoid an excessive burden on river ecosystems. The current Nenskra ESIA fails to assess the cumulative environmental and social impacts of all projects combined.

There is also high seismic risk [1]
Socio-economic ImpactsPotential: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Outcome
Project StatusUnder construction
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseInstitutional changes
Strengthening of participation
Restoration of ancient village level or community level democratic institution (Lalkhor)
Development of AlternativesThe traditional liqwbääl (Svan congress) ruled that Svans are an indigenous people with its own language, traditions and culture and that it is necessary to restore the ancient tradition of holding a pan-Svan congress called lalkhor in order to have more of a say in large-scale infrastructure projects which are planned in the region. According to Svan customary law, respected members of the community serve on the Ialkhor (congress) and are entrusted with mediating conflicts and disputes. (The last time the council met is so long time ago that it is barely within living memory among the oldest members of the community [4])

Other issues discussed during the congress included the need to agree on the strategy for preventing the planned construction of the Khudoni hydro power plant (Khudonhesi in Georgian), including all seventeen communities in the decision-making process regarding planned hydroelectric and mining projects, and develop a legal framework for protecting lands under traditional ownership, which are vulnerable to takeovers by the government and companies.

The congress also concluded that Svaneti’s model of development should move away from hydroelectric infrastructure projects and focus instead on development of ecotourism and agriculture.
Do you consider this as a success?Not Sure
Why? Explain briefly.The people of Chuberi and nearby villages know the experience of the Svan communities living downstream in Khaishi where the 702 MW Khudoni dam is planned to be built. The Georgian state sold their ancestral lands for next to nothing to the Khudoni dam promoter. The lands and the dam remains a subject of fierce protests to date.[1]

This has made people coming together with more awareness of what is going to happen. An ancient traditional congress of respected people from the village has been called back. The resistance is still ongoing.
Sources and Materials
Links

[2] Key Agreements Signed in $1B Nenskra Hydropower Plant in Georgia
[click to view]

Hydroworld
[click to view]

International Finance Corporation
[click to view]

[4] Democracy and Freedom Watch - Svan council convenes to stop hydro power plants

by DOMINIK K. CAGARA | Jun 15, 2016
[click to view]

[5] Eca-uk
[click to view]

[3] Democracy and Freedom Watch - Protests resume against the Nenskra hydro power plant in Svaneti

by DOMINIK K. CAGARA | Jul 6, 2016
[click to view]

[1] Bankwatch Network - Nenskra hydropower plant, Georgia
[click to view]

Salini Impregilo website
[click to view]

Other Documents

Map of Upper Svaneti hydropower plans Source: Bankwatch

http://bankwatch.org/our-work/projects/hydropower-development-georgia/map-upper-svaneti
[click to view]

Protest against the dam Source: DFWatch
[click to view]

Other CommentsMost of the information is retrieved from Bankwatch reports. For more information contact:

David Chipashvili

Green Alternative/CEE Bankwatch Network

Georgian Campaigner

[email protected]
Meta Information
ContributorDaniela Del Bene - ICTA/UAB
Last update14/12/2016
Related conflicts
Comments