Pondoland Wild Coast Xolobeni mining threat, South Africa

The Xolobeni mining of titanium in sand dunes in the Amadiba traditional area by Australian company Mineral Commodities (MRC) has been opposed. The chairman of the Amadiba Crisis Committee, "Bazooka" Rhadebe, was assassinated in March 2016.


Description

The Australian company, Mineral Commodities Ltd. (MRC), through its subsidiary Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM) and local partner Xolco, proposes to mine ilmenite, rutile, zircon etc from old sand dunes at Xolobeni on the Pondoland Coast.

See more...
Basic Data
NamePondoland Wild Coast Xolobeni mining threat, South Africa
CountrySouth Africa
ProvinceEastern Cape
SiteXolobeni, Pondoland
Accuracy of LocationMEDIUM regional level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Tailings from mines
Mineral ore exploration
Transport infrastructure networks (roads, railways, hydroways, canals and pipelines)
Land acquisition conflicts
Establishment of reserves/national parks
Specific CommoditiesIlmenite, Rutile, Zircon
Iron ore
Titanium ores
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsThe Xolobeni deposit is cited on MRC website as being the 10th largest heavy mineral deposit in the world, with 346 million tonnes. Mining is proposed over 6 blocks over 25 years.

Historical evidence suggests that the amaMpondo people have lived in the area for at least 500 years.

It is unlikely that the company would be able to rehabilitate the area after mining.

In July 2016, the Australian company left. As reported (by Sikonathi Mantshantsha) , the Pondoland community of Xolobeni on the Wild Coast tasted rare victory in its 13-year fight against Australia’s Mineral Resources Commodities (MRC), which said it would be selling its 56% stake in its controversial project to mine an environmentally sensitive piece of coastal land. MRC said it would be disposing of its stake in the mineral sands project to Keysha Investments. The antimining activists, however, are not satisfied with the Australians’ departure. "Their selling the stake is just playing games," said Nonhle Mbuthuma, chairwoman of the AmaDiba Crisis Committee. "We did not say we don’t want an Australian company mining here. We said there will be no mining on our land."
Project Area (in hectares)3000
Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Population10,000
Start Date2003
Company Names or State EnterprisesMineral Commodities Ltd. (MRC) (MRC) from Australia - through its subsidiary Transworld Energy and Minerals, South Africa and Xolco, South Africa
Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM) from South Africa
Xolco from South Africa
Relevant government actorsDepartment of Mineral Resources, Department of Water, Department of Environmental Affairs, Department of Land Affairs
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersSAFCEI, Wilderness Foundation, EWT, Sustaining the Wild Coast (SWC) Amadiba Crisis Committee (ACC)
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
When did the mobilization beginPREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Women
Recreational users
Local scientists/professionals
Religious groups
Forms of MobilizationBlockades
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Street protest/marches
Protest march, Newsletters, Websites, Legal action
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Desertification/Drought, Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Food insecurity (crop damage), Waste overflow, Oil spills, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Mine tailing spills
OtherDisplacement of existing agriculture and resource use into other areas will lead to increased grazing pressure and over-utilisation of other resources such as medicinal plants and animals hunted for food.
Health ImpactsPotential: Accidents, Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Malnutrition, Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..) , Health problems related to alcoholism, prostitution, Occupational disease and accidents, Infectious diseases, Deaths, Other environmental related diseases
OtherWater pollution, dust pollution, noise pollution, degradation of natural resources relied upon by local communities affecting these communities ability to survive eg destruction of grazing lands, fields, gardens, water resources, spread of HIV infection.
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Increase in violence and crime, Violations of human rights
Potential: Displacement, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..), Specific impacts on women, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
OtherLost economic opportunities in ecotourism. Spread of social diseases and corruption of traditional values.
Outcome
Project StatusProposed (exploration phase)
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCorruption
Migration/displacement
Institutional changes
The mining application has been done without proper consultation with the community. Laws of the country were not followed. Used a top-down approach. Officials undermined the rights of local people because they are illiterate. Mining would take away land that local people use as a source of livelihood. Local customs regarding appropriate pathways for community consultation through elected village elders were ignored. Listening to local peoples views on their preferred development options instead of sidelining these, proper compliance with legislation and prosecution for human rights abuses and intimidation would go a long way towards resolving the issue.
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Criminalization of activists
Repression
Deaths
Violent targeting of activists
Development of AlternativesLow impact development based on proposals by the affected communities, that will strengthen community capacity to develop their own small-scale community based eco-tourism and sustainable agriculture projects. Upgrading of local roads to connect villages to local towns, rather than building a tolled inter-city highway.
Do you consider this as a success?Not Sure
Why? Explain briefly.The community has been assisted by the NGO Sustaining the Wild Coast (SWC) in linking to legal aid, media contacts, social workers, other NGOs etc. to inform people of their rights and how to access other resources.

Affected communities have formed the Amadiba Crisis Committee (ACC) to coordinate community resistance to the mining. The case has become internally very well known after the killing of "Bazooka" Rhadebe in March 2016, he was te head of the ACC.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

South African Constitution, South African National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), Transkei Decree, Coastal Conservation Management Act. Mineral Resources and Petroleum Act

References

Defending land, Life and Dignity - Women Speak Out. International Women and Mining Network. Tanya Roberts Davies. Jan 2010. pages 16-18.

Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. 2010. Ecosystem Profile. Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany Biodiveristy Hotspot. Final April 2010. Conservation International Southern African Hotspots Programme and South African National Biodiversity Institute.

De Villiers, D and Costello, J. 2006. Mkambati and the Wild Coast. Wilderness Safaris.

Guyot,S. and Dellier, J. 2010. Rethinking the Wild Coast, South Africa. Ecofrontiers vs Livelihoods in Pondoland. University of Limoges. France

Rural South Africa is on a Precipice. Countryside sliding into ever more violent confrontations. By Mbongiseni Buthelezi and Sithandiwe Yeni, 21 April 2016. OPINION | SOUTH AFRICA

Setting the boundaries of a social licence for mining in South Africa. The Xolobeni Mineral Sands Project. Ichumile Gqada. South African Institute of International Affairs. Paper 99 Nov 2011. -

Links

[click to view]

[click to view]

[click to view]

12 Feb 2016 - Tariro Washinyira. We will die for our land, say angry Xolobeni villagers as dune mining looms
[click to view]

Resource rich Xolobeni eyed by Australian company for mining exploits, radio interview with both sides, 7 April 2016
[click to view]

Xolobeni split over mine in ‘a land of plenty’ business/news / 22 April 2016, by Dineo Faku
[click to view]

Ground Up staff, 23 April 2016, Opponent of Xolobeni titanium mine assassinated. Others fear for their lives
[click to view]

How the assassination of Bazooka Radebe will affect future mining in Xolobeni..The week that was in Mining with Warren Dick, editor of
[click to view]

Media Links

[click to view]

[click to view]

[click to view]

[click to view]

[click to view]

[click to view]

[click to view]

UnderMining Life: Activists threatened in South Africa, Earthlore. Sphiwe Mazibuko's 9 minute documentary exposes the intimidation
[click to view]

Other Documents

[click to view]

Other Commentshttp://www.ejolt.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/FS-27.pdf

Kamleshan Pillay, The Xolobeni Heavy Minerals Sands Project on the Wild Coast, South Africa, EJOLT Factsheet No. 27, 3 p., 2015
Meta Information
ContributorVal Payn – Save the Wild Coast Campaign (SWC) (updated, JMA)
Last update19/07/2016
Comments