Richards Bay Minerals dune mining, South Africa

Description

Mining of ilmenite, rutile and zircon from deposits in forested coastal sand dunes has been taking place since the mid 1970s, by Richards Bay Minerals (RBM), a subsidiary of Rio Tinto.

See more...
Basic Data
NameRichards Bay Minerals dune mining, South Africa
CountrySouth Africa
ProvinceKwaZulu-Natal
Site15Km north of Richards Bay
Accuracy of LocationMEDIUM regional level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Deforestation
Mineral processing
Specific CommoditiesIlmenite, Rutile And Zircon
Iron ore
Titanium ores
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsTitania slag capacity is 1 Mt/year and pig iron production 550 000 t/year. Rutile output totals 100 000 t/year and zircon 250 000 t/year - in total, nearly 2 Mt/year of mineral output, 95% of it for export.

Project Area (in hectares)6,000
Level of Investment (in USD)Billions
Type of PopulationSemi-urban
Potential Affected PopulationFuture generations
Start Date1980
Company Names or State EnterprisesRichards Bay Minerals (RBM) from South Africa
Rio Tinto (Rio Tinto ) from Australia - formerly Rio Tinto Zinc (RTZ)
Relevant government actorsDepartment of Mineral Resources, Department of Trade and Industries, Department of Water Affairs, Department of Environment
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersgroundWork (Friends of the Earth), Isolemvelo Community Environmental Group (ICEG), Timberwatch Coalition
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingInformal workers
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of MobilizationDevelopment of a network/collective action
Official complaint letters and petitions
Street protest/marches
Establishing a local watch-dog organisation to raise awareness among local communities. International pressure to change the mining companys behaviour.
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Waste overflow, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Mine tailing spills
Potential: Desertification/Drought, Fires, Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Food insecurity (crop damage), Oil spills
OtherIntroduction of invasive alien plants and loss of ecosystem function
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Other environmental related diseases
Potential: Accidents, Malnutrition, Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..) , Health problems related to alcoholism, prostitution, Occupational disease and accidents, Infectious diseases, Deaths
OtherExposure to radiation from Monazite, dangerous work, water contamination. Loss of medicinal plants.
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..), Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Increase in violence and crime, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Specific impacts on women
OtherThe migration of work-seekers from other regions into the mining area has created competition for limited jobs and land. Increased incidence of social diseases. Contract workers poorly paid with little security.
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCompensation
Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
The mining company has failed to honour its original undertakings in terms of worker benefits (housing, medical etc.) and failed to deliver the environmental protection and restoration that was promised.
Development of AlternativesThe problem is what might happen when the mining in the area comes to an end, as there are no guarantees or funds in trust to ensure that the area will be properly restored.
Do you consider this as a success?No
Why? Explain briefly.The impacted community has limited resources and most community members who are aware of the problems feel intimidated by the public relations propaganda power of the mining company and by the political support and protection the mining company receives.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

National Constitution

Mineral Resorces Act

National Environment Management Act (NEMA)

National Water Act

References

The Gulliver File - Roger Moody

Partizans

SABC TV 50/50 Pro and anti mining video inserts (Available on DVD)

Campaign for St Lucia (CSL) video

Links

Mines and Communities -
[click to view]

Article:
[click to view]

[click to view]

Media Links

To be added later

Other CommentsThe mining company has managed to subdue community resistance through so-called community development projects and token donations to schools etc.
Meta Information
ContributorWally Menne
Last update08/04/2014
Comments