Tarbela Dam, Pakistan

Description

Originally constructed in 1974, the Tarbela Dam is the world s largest earth- and rock-filled structure, standing almost 500 feet high and straddling the Indus River for 9,000 feet. Its existing hydropower facilities supply about 16% of the electricity generated in Pakistan. The primary purpose of the Tarbela Dam Project was to regulate the flows of the Indus River for irrigation use. This project is in fact part of a wider set of infrastructure projects, the so-called Indus Basin Irrigation System (IBIS), which is the world s largest irrigation system. Other objectives were to achieve substantial generation of hydroelectric power and flood control by conserving snow melt and monsoon flows of the Indus River.

See more...
Basic Data
NameTarbela Dam, Pakistan
CountryPakistan
ProvinceHaripur District
SiteHazara Division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Water Management
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Dams and water distribution conflicts
Water access rights and entitlements
Specific CommoditiesElectricity
Water
Land
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsPower generation capacity is 3,478 MW through 14 power generating units.

Catchment area of the reservoir created by the dam is 169,600 square kilometres. The reservoir, with a maximum depth of more than 450ft, can impound up to 11.62 million acre foot (MAF) of water at the maximum lake elevation of 1,550ft. Net usable capacity of the reservoir is 9.68MAF.

The water is stocked during the months of June, July and August, when the river flow is at its maximum.

Project Area (in hectares)26000
Level of Investment (in USD)1,490,000,000 (*)
Type of PopulationRural
Start Date1970
Company Names or State EnterprisesSacyr from Spain
Costruzioni generali Farsura from Italy
Astaldi from Italy
Compagnie de Constructions Internationales from France
Compagnie Francaise dEntreprises from France
Societe de Construction de Batignolles from France
Hochtief from Germany
Philipp Holzmann from Germany
Strabag Bau from Germany
Ed Zueblin from Germany
C. Baresel from Germany
Conrad Zschokke from Switzerland
Losinger from Switzerland
Relevant government actorsGovernment of Pakistan, Water and Power Development Authority
International and Financial InstitutionsThe World Bank (WB) from United States of America
International Development Association (IDA)
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersInternational Rivers, http://www.internationalrivers.org/campaigns/pakistan, Pakistan Network for Rivers, Dams and People (PNRDP)
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)LOW (some local organising)
When did the mobilization beginUNKNOWN
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Landless peasants
Social movements
Forms of MobilizationDevelopment of a network/collective action
Street protest/marches
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Groundwater pollution or depletion
Health ImpactsPotential: Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..)
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Increase in violence and crime, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Violations of human rights
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCorruption
Criminalization of activists
Migration/displacement
Repression
Development of AlternativesOpponents to the project jointly criticizes the government's outdated policies, stating the need to replace the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 with a more comprehensive relocation policy. They also stated that the government departments in charge of rehabilitating affected peoples are grossly mismanaged, bureaucratic and corrupt and in need of reorganization.

They put forward a series of demands:

-the adoption of the report of the World Commission on Dams as a guiding principle for policy-making and implementation;

-adequate relocation and compensation for all direct and indirect affected people,

-the definition of 'affected' be broadened

-eligibility policies made more just

-environmental clean up projects

-national participation in the policy-making and implementation process.

Do you consider this as a success?No
Why? Explain briefly.Many families have not yet received due rehabilitation and compensation measures, even after so many years.

The project does not benefit local communities and is part of a top-down energy generation plan with poor consideration of small communities claims.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

Indus Basin Multi-Purpose Project
[click to view]

Land Acquisition Act 1984
[click to view]

References

Published in the proceedings of River Flow 2012, 5-7 September 2012
[click to view]

Asian Development Bank – TA, Water Resources Sector Strategy, 'National Water Sector Profile', April 2002

Asianics, 'A Case Study of Tarbela Dam', a report for the World Commission on Dams, 2001

M. Roca, 'Tarbela Dam in Pakistan. Case study of reservoir sedimentation'

HR Wallingford, Wallingford, UK

Links

(1) Expanding the Power of Tarbela Dam
[click to view]

(2) US funds Tarbela dam restoration
[click to view]

(3) International Rivers
[click to view]

Water-Technology, 'Tarbela Dam Project, Haripur District, Pakistan'
[click to view]

PWC protests over extra water releases for power generation
[click to view]

Media Links

Italian Ambassador on Italian involvement into the dam construction and basic features of the dam project:
[click to view]

Other Comments(*) The project was fully completed in 1984, at a cost of $1.49 bn.

The funds coming now for the extension plans are currently under estimation.
Meta Information
ContributorDaniela Del Bene
Last update08/04/2014
Comments