Karnataka government has proposed a 1000 MW coal fired thermal power plant at Chamalapura, H.D.Kote taluk, Mysore district in early 2007. The project was proposed to built with a public-private partnership model. It was to be coordinated by the Power Company of Karnataka Ltd(PCKL), a Special Purpose Vehicle of the State Government. This region with its verdant agricultural lands is sandwiched between the Kabini and Cauvery rivers, and has a wide network of lakes. There are about 80 lakes (perennial and non perennial) lying within 8 km radius of Chamalapura. The proposed power plant is expected to result in land acquisition of 3000 acres (including 600 odd acres of forest lands) and displace at least 13,000 people, in Chamalapura & its neighboring villages. |
Description:
Basic Data
| Name of conflict: | Chamalapura Thermal Power Plant, Karnataka, India |
| Country: | India |
| State or province: | Karnataka |
| (municipality or city/town) | Village- Chamalapura; Taluk- H.D.Kote; District- Mysore |
| Accuracy of location | HIGH (Local level) |
Source of Conflict
| Type of conflict: 1st level: | Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy |
| Type of conflict: 2nd level : | Land acquisition conflicts Thermal power plants |
| Specific commodities: | Land Coal Electricity |
Project Details and Actors
| Project details: | The Government had decided to implement three thermal power projects of 1,000 MW each in Gulbarga, Belgaum and Chamalapura. The project was convienced in early 2007 [5]. On 08 August 2007, the Power Company of Karnataka Ltd (PCKL) issued a Global Invitation for Request for Qualification (RFQ), inviting bids for setting up a 1000 MW power plant at Chamalapura. Bids from a number of companies including Reliance Power and Tatas are said to have been received in response to the RFQ, according to newspapers [1]. The power plant was proposed to be set up under the BOO (Build, Own and Operate) model, as a public-private partnership and mooted by agencies of the Karnataka government [3]. |
| Project area: | 1,214 |
| Type of population | Rural |
| Affected Population: | 13000 |
| Start of the conflict: | 2007 |
| Company names or state enterprises: | Power Company of Karnataka Limited (PCKL) from India |
| Relevant government actors: | Government of Karnataka |
| Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | Chamalapura Ushna Vidyut Sthavara Virodhi Horata Samanvaya Samithi, Enviornment Support Group, http://www.esgindia.org/campaigns/chamalapura.html, Federation of the Progressive Associations in Mysore, Many farmers, litterateurs, activists of progressive organisations, theatre personalities and students [4] |
Conflict and Mobilization
| Intensity | HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...) |
| Reaction stage | In REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation) |
| Groups mobilizing: | Farmers Indigenous groups or traditional communities Local ejos Landless peasants Local government/political parties Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Women Local scientists/professionals theatre personalities students |
| Forms of mobilization: | Blockades Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism Objections to the EIA Official complaint letters and petitions Street protest/marches |
Impacts of the project
| Environmental Impacts | Potential: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity |
| Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Land dispossession Potential: displacement, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Specific impacts on women, Violations of human rights, Loss of landscape/sense of place |
Outcome
| Project Status | Stopped |
| Conflict outcome / response: | Compensation New legislation Strengthening of participation New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study Project cancelled |
| Development of alternatives: | Protestors had communicated to the Government that under no circumstances they will allow the plant to come up as, according to them, it is detrimental to their lives and livelihood. They demanded an explanation from the Government on the rationale behind branding fertile land as barren land and cautioned that there would be a repetition of what happened at Nandigram in West Bengal, if the State used force in the matter. [2, 4]. |
| Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | Not Sure |
| Briefly explain: | Mysore Grahakara Samiti, filed a petition to the the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission in 2007 to initiate a public hearing proceedings on the 06 March 2008. The petition was filed to look into the matter of the desirability of establishing 1000 MW coal based power projects at different places in Karnataka, including one at Chamalapura, Mysore District. The initial hearing on the 06 March 2008 was followed by a site visit by the members of the KERC to the project affected villages on 20 March 2008 and a final hearing on the 03 April 2008. Along with residents from project affected villages and citizens. Citizens including Environment Support Group raised the following key concerns: 1.The Chamalapura project was initiated without following the clearance procedure prescribed under the law. 2.The Government of Karnataka has granted in-principle clearance to the allocation of 3.9 TMC (Thousand Million Cubic Feet) of water for use by three power plants (including the one at Chamalapura) from the Cauvery River Basin. However, data accessed from the Karnataka Water Resources Department and the Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Ltd. for the decade of 1997-2008, clearly demonstrate that the Kabini River (which is in the Cauvery Basin) does not have even 1.56 TMC of water that is claimed to be needed for the 1,000 MW Chamalapura power plant and its ancillary facilities. 3.Chamalapura as a site for a 1000 MW coal fired thermal power plant does not satisfy the requirements prescribed by the Guidelines for Siting Thermal Power Plants, 1987 of the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) or the Siting Standards prescribed by the Karnataka Dept of Ecology & Environment & the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB). 4.Taking cognizance of the submissions made by project affected villagers, Gram Panchayat members, social action groups (including ESG), environmentalists and concerned citizens in the course of the Public Hearing, the KERC in its order dated 19th May 2008 , observed that the 'bidding process lack(ed) transparency' and was carried out in 'an extremely casual manner.' The KERC also recommended that the State Government should take a de-novo decision to set up on the Chamalapura proposal, after looking into all relevant aspects like 'environment and heritage, land acquisition, fuel linkage, water supply... and so on.' [1] Karnataka Power Minister to announce in late 2008 that the power plant would not be constructed against the wishes of the people. While there has been no official statement withdrawing the project proposal, it is reliably understood that the Chamalapura site has been dropped [2] |
Sources and Materials
| Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict |
| |||||||||||
| Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites |
| |||||||||||
| Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network |
|
Meta information
| Contributor: | Swapan Kumar Patra |
| Last update | 20/07/2014 |
Comments