Last update:
2016-08-22

Coal Run neighborhood in Zanesville, Ohio, USA

50 year-long battle to reclaim right to clean water and sanitation in Ohio; read about the successful achievement of a black community (despite the shamefully long time it took..)


Description:

For 48 years residents of the Coal Run neighborhood of Zanesville, Ohio - a former coal-mining center and a primarily black community of about 25 homes - fought tirelessly to get water service from the city. In 1956, the city built a water main that ended just short of the neighborhood, a water main from which the county Water Authority built new water lines and expanded service to surrounding areas. In 1999, a lifelong resident of Coal Run, who discovered that her white neighbors’ request for a water hookup had been approved began arguing for equal rights - attending city council meetings, lobbying government officials, and talking to other black neighbors [1].

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Coal Run neighborhood in Zanesville, Ohio, USA
Country:translation missing: en.countries.united_states_of_america
State or province:Ohio
Location of conflict:Zanesville
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Water Management
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Water access rights and entitlements
Specific commodities:Water
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

Type of populationRural
Affected Population:67
Start of the conflict:01/01/1956
End of the conflict:10/07/2008
Relevant government actors:City of Zanesville, Muskingum County, East Muskingum Water Authority, U.S. District Court of Ohio
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Ohio Civil Rights Commission
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Groups mobilizing:Neighbours/citizens/communities
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Forms of mobilization:Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Public campaigns
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Groundwater pollution or depletion, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Health ImpactsVisible: Other environmental related diseases, Other Health impacts
Other Health impactsLack of clean water, not getting enough drinking water
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Violations of human rights
Outcome
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Technical solutions to improve resource supply/quality/distribution
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:Yes, the community was able to work with a third party organization (Ohio Civil Rights Commission) and obtain the water access that was available to all of their white neighbors. They also won a discrimination suit that provided them with compensation for the burdens they had endured, which allowed each defendant to receive between $15,000 and $30,000 in compensation. In 2008, the residents of Coal Run were given access to public water.
Sources and Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[1] Making Water a Matter of Race - Time Magazine, Claire Suddath, July 14, 2008
[click to view]

[2] Zanesville's black residents' fight for clean water, bittersweet - The Columbus Dispatch, Eric Lyttle, February 16, 2014
[click to view]

[3] Racial Discrimination in Ohio: Neighborhood Denied Water Service - July 11, 2008, Julie Carr Smyth, The Associated Press
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
[click to view]

Kennedy v City of Zanesville
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Video about the case
[click to view]

Other documents

Coal Run neighborhood family cistern
[click to view]

Zanesville Water Map Map showing Zanesville water line and where it stops relative to the Coal Run neighborhood
[click to view]

Old outhouse used by some families To help conserve water in the house and avoid having to carry water into homes for use in toilets, some families used outhouses.
[click to view]

Other comments:This is one of the top 40 influential environmental justice cases in the United States identified from a national survey of environmental activists, scholars and other leaders by graduate students at the University of Michigan.
Meta information
Contributor:Bernadette Grafton and Paul Mohai, [email protected] and [email protected], University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment
Last update22/08/2016
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.