Native American´s Sioux against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), USA

"We are not protestors. We are life protectors": Standing Rock Sioux Tribe resist against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, a 1886 km underground oil pipeline for transport around 470,000 barrels of crude oil per day.


Description

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is part of the Bakken Pipeline Project (BPP). A 1886 km underground oil pipeline to transport around 470,000 barrels of crude oil a day from North Dakota to Illinois, where it will shipped to refineries. The owner is the Energy Transfer Crude Oil, a Texas-based company and is financed by more than 15 banks around the world.

See more...
Basic Data
NameNative American´s Sioux against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), USA
CountryUnited States of America
ProvinceNorth Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Ilinois.
SiteStanding Rock
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Land acquisition conflicts
Water access rights and entitlements
Transport infrastructure networks (roads, railways, hydroways, canals and pipelines)
Specific CommoditiesCrude oil
Land
Project Details and Actors
Project Details-A underground pipeline across both sides of Lake Oahe in North Dakota.

-The pipeline is planned to carry 470,000 barrels per day (75,000 m3/d) of crude oil "based on contractual commitments to date".[11] The capacity may be increased up to 570,000 barrels per day (91,000 m3/d)

-According with the company, Lake Oahe already contains eight other pipelines uneventfully operating adjacent to the path of the Dakota Access Pipeline, as well as one high-voltage electric transmission line.

-DAPL crosses at least 95 feet below the bottom of Lake Oahe, and at points, up to 115 feet below.

-The steel pipeline, developed and majority owned by Energy Transfer Partners, would connect the Bakken and Three Forks oil production areas in North Dakota to an existing crude oil terminal and pipeline terminus in Illinois.

-The entire project consist in 1,000-mile-long, 30 inches in diameter, it could transport an estimated 470,000 to 570,000 barrels of oil per day.

-The project, which traverses four states, is 92 percent complete overall and 99 percent complete in North Dakota.

-According with the company the Project will create 40 permanent jobs and 8,200 to 12,000 temporary jobs
Project Area (in hectares)1,900 km
Level of Investment (in USD)3,800,000,000
Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Population8,000
Start Date06/2016
Company Names or State EnterprisesEnergy Transfer Crude Oil Company from United States of America - owner
Dakota Access, LLC from United States of America - Subsidiary of Energy Transfer Crude Oil Company, LLC,
Phillips 66 from United States of America - co-investor
Enbridge Energy Partners LP (EEP) from United States of America - co-investor
Marathon Petroleum Corporation from United States of America - co-investor
Relevant government actorsU.S. Department of the Army; U.S Government; State of North Dakota;Department of Justice; Department of the Interior; Natural Resources Defense Council; American Petroleum Institute;The Army Corps of Engineers;
International and Financial InstitutionsCitybank from United States of America
Wells Fargo
BNP Paribas (BNP) from France
SunTrust
Royal Bank of Scotland from United Kingdom
Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ (5) from Japan
Mizuho Bank from Japan
TD Securities
ABN AMRO Capital
ING Bank NV from Netherlands
Norway's largest financial services group (DnB NOR ASA) from Norway
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) from China
SMBC Nikko Securities from Japan
Société Générale Corporate & Investment Banking (SGCIB) from France
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersEJOS: Great Sioux Nation,

Supporters: National Congress of American Indians, Greenpeace; Science & Environmental Health Network; Sierra Club; Black Lives Matter (BLM),
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingIndigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Women
Local scientists/professionals
Sioux tribes. They have received solidarity visits from many other indigenous peoples' delegations (from Hawaii, Ecuador, Brazil, among others)
Forms of MobilizationArguments for the rights of mother nature
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Blockades
Street protest/marches
Official complaint letters and petitions
Ask for disinvestments actions; for example #DeFund DAPL campaign.
Public campaigns
Artistic and creative actions (eg guerilla theatre, murals)
Land occupation
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Occupation of buildings/public spaces
Appeals/recourse to economic valuation of the environment
Shareholder/financial activism.
Development of alternative proposals
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation
Potential: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Global warming, Soil contamination, Oil spills, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Health ImpactsVisible: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..)
Potential: Accidents
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights
Potential: Displacement, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Specific impacts on women
Outcome
Project StatusUnder construction
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCriminalization of activists
Court decision (failure for environmental justice)
Repression
Strengthening of participation
Under negotiation
Violent targeting of activists
Fostering a culture of peace
Application of existing regulations
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Development of AlternativesOn december 2016, The Army announced to explore alternate routes for the pipeline crossing.

Indians Americans claim for the recognitions and respect of govern theirselfs snd their land.
Do you consider this as a success?Not Sure
Why? Explain briefly.The US Army Corps of Engineers suspended the project after months of protest, but in February 2017 said it planned to grant final easement for the remaining section of the project.
Sources and Materials
Legislations

Treaty of Fort Laramie of April 29, 1868

References

Environmental assessment: Dakota Access Pipeline Project, crossings of flowage easements and federal lands
[click to view]

Links

Divesting in DAPL in Favor of American Indian-Owned Banks
[click to view]

Trump backs Keystone and Dakota Access Pipelines
[click to view]

We´re missing 90 percent of the Dakota Access Pipeline Story
[click to view]

Push to Evict Remaining NoDAPL Water Protectors Intensifies
[click to view]

JUST IN: The secretary of the Army Corps of Engineers told Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II that the current route for the controversial Dakota Access pipeline will be denied.
[click to view]

Army halts construction of DAP
[click to view]

‘Water Is Life’: A Look Inside the Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters’ Camp
[click to view]

Dakota Access Pipeline: US Army Corps of Engineers shuts down protesters
[click to view]

Black Lives Matter Delegation Returns from Standing Rock Camp
[click to view]

‘Divestment is our goal’: Seattle City Council to vote on pulling $3 billion from Wells Fargo over Dakota Access Pipeline
[click to view]

Army Corps ruling is a big win for foes of Dakota Access Pipeline
[click to view]

Veterans beg forgiveness at Standing Rock:
[click to view]

Breaking: DAPL Construction on Hold Pending Further Review and Tribal Consultation
[click to view]

Media Links

People at Standing Rock are still being arrested, and the Dakota Access Pipeline could be built under Trump
[click to view]

Naomi Klein´s video: "I feel like I have my future back!" Celebrating victory with Tokata Iron Eyes, 13 yr old water protector
[click to view]

LIVE in DC: Indigenous leaders and climate activists rally against the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines
[click to view]

“We beg for your forgiveness”: Veterans join Native elders in celebration ceremony
[click to view]

Company Arguments: Addressing Misconceptions About The Dakota Access Pipeline
[click to view]

Protesters occupy Standing Rock reservation, North Dakota (forms of protest)
[click to view]

Action to DeFund DAPL
[click to view]

LaDonna Brave Bull Allard
[click to view]

Trump signs order reviving controversial pipeline projects – video
[click to view]

Official Website of Stand With Standing Rock
[click to view]

Other Documents

Water is Sacred
[click to view]

NO DAPL
[click to view]

Resist Dakota
[click to view]

Delegation of Sarayaku people in visit to Sacred Stone camp Source: http://www.kfyrtv.com/content/news/Sarayaku-Trie-from-Ecuador-joins-Dakota-Access-Pipeline-protesters-at-Sacred-Stone-Camp-393474791.html
[click to view]

Other Comments- Dakota is the tribal name of the Dakota Sioux, meaning "friendly" or "allied."

-“We do not own the land, the land owns us.”said a spiritual leader in North Dakota

-On the Dakota language, the word “oahe” signifies “a place to stand on.”

-Some slogans of the campaign are: "You can´t drink oil!" and " Water is Life! "
Meta Information
ContributorGrettel Navas, ENVJustice Project
Last update01/03/2017
Comments