08/04/2014

Ikot Ado Udo Case, Nigeria

Description:

Shell placed an oil installation in the village of Ikot Ada Udo nearly 50 years ago at the head of an oil well. Shortly after it installed the wellhead, Shell decided not to produce oil in that place but left the installation in place. Since then, the wellhead has been left abandoned among the vegetable gardens of the village of Ikot Ada Udo. It has been nicknamed the Christmas tree because it resembles one.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Ikot Ado Udo Case, Nigeria
Country:Nigeria
State or province:Akwa Ibom State
(municipality or city/town)Ikot Ada Udo Local Government Area
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Oil and gas exploration and extraction
Pollution related to transport (spills, dust, emissions)
Aquaculture and fisheries
Specific commodities:
Crude oil
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

Project area:50
Type of populationUrban
Start of the conflict:1996
Company names or state enterprises:Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) from Netherlands
Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) from Nigeria
Relevant government actors:NOSDRA , Federal Ministry of Environment
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Friends of the Earth, Netherlands (Milieu Defensie)
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Local ejos
Landless peasants
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Trade unions
Women
Local scientists/professionals
translation missing: en.m.mobilizing_groups.fisher_people
Forms of mobilization:Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Land occupation
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Occupation of buildings/public spaces
Appeals/recourse to economic valuation of the environment
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Oil spills, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality
Potential: Fires, Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Genetic contamination, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…)
Potential: Malnutrition, Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Infectious diseases
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: displacement, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Specific impacts on women, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Militarization and increased police presence
Outcome
Project StatusProposed (exploration phase)
Conflict outcome / response:Under negotiation
Development of alternatives:-Develop a solid plan to clean up the oil pollution in Ikot Ada Udo community and the entire Niger Delta.

As recommended by the UN, this plan should include Shell depositing $1 billion to a special emergency fund for the most urgent clean up operations in the Niger Delta.

-Close all oil wells that are illegally flaring gas before January 1, 2013 in Ikot Ada Udo and other Niger Delta -Develop a clear plan to improve the maintenance of the pipeline network in Nigeria, and protect them against theft and sabotage.

-Offer serious financial compensation to farmers and fishermen whose means of living have been destroyed as a result of the oil leaks in the community and the entire Niger Delta.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:Aquaculture is still not possible and residents have still received no compensation. Shell has provided the village with funding for a drinking water tank and water pipes. In the meantime, a small wall has also been constructed about the Christmas tree, and Shell has ordered a concrete plug to be installed.

In early November 2007 the Nigerian parliament passed a resolution to ensure that shell clean up the community. But this has not yielded meaningful results as the pollution still prevails.

Although the case has be charged to court in the Netherlands, waiting Justice in favour of the affect community.
Sources and Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

National oil spill Detection and Remediation Agency.(NOSDRA)

Federal Ministry of Environment

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

The Ikot Ado Udo Case: The hissing and Leaking Christmas Tree.Facts sheet by Milieu Defensie.

Knee Deep in crude Volume 1. A Publication of Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria.

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Justice Nigeria Now
[click to view]

'Nigerian farmers sue Shell over oil pipe leaks'
[click to view]

[click to view]

Milieu Defensie
[click to view]

Milieu Defensie
[click to view]

Milieu Defensie
[click to view]

Legal Oil
[click to view]

CBC News
[click to view]

All Africa
[click to view]

Worse then Bad
[click to view]

Nigeria Current

,-era-foen-urges-shell.html
[click to view]

Sweet Crude Reports
[click to view]

Other comments:ANGLO-Dutch oil and gas super major, Shell, will appear in a Dutch court to account for damage it caused in Nigeria. This is the first time in history; a European company is appearing in a Dutch court.

The court case against Shells oil spills in Nigeria has been filed by four Nigerian plaintiffs in conjunction with Friends of the Earth Netherlands and supported by Friends of the Earth Nigeria.

Lawyers for both parties will plea at a key hearing in The Hague this coming October 11 2012, at 9:30am. The verdict is however, expected early in 2013.
Meta information
Contributor:Nnimmo Bassey
Last update08/04/2014
Comments