Geshuri activities, a privately owned Israeli agrochemicals company that manufactures pesticides and fertilizers has been denounced by the potential serious health implications of its site of occupation for the many residents neighbouring the factories. |
Israeli chemical plant closed down by court order in Israel due to toxic emissions has now moved across the green line and continues to operate leading to serious health impacts.
Description:
Basic Data
| Name of conflict: | Israeli settlement industries polluting Tulkarem, Palestine |
| Country: | Palestine |
| State or province: | West Bank |
| Location of conflict: | Tulkarem |
| Accuracy of location | HIGH (Local level) |
Source of Conflict
| Type of conflict. 1st level: | Industrial and Utilities conflicts |
| Type of conflict. 2nd level: | Chemical industries |
| Specific commodities: | Chemical products Pesticides Industrial waste |
Project Details and Actors
| Project details | 500 dunams : |
| Type of population | Semi-urban |
| Affected Population: | 60.000 (Turlkarm population) |
| Start of the conflict: | 01/01/1987 |
| Company names or state enterprises: | Keshet Prima and Geshuri from Israel |
| Relevant government actors: | Israeli Occupying Forces, Ministry of Industry Israel trade and employment |
| Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | Local farmers’ union, Civil society Organizations, Human Rights Organizations. |
Conflict & Mobilization
| Intensity | MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization) |
| Reaction stage | In REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation) |
| Groups mobilizing: | Farmers Industrial workers Informal workers Local government/political parties Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Trade unions Local scientists/professionals |
| Forms of mobilization: | Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..) Creation of alternative reports/knowledge Development of a network/collective action Involvement of national and international NGOs Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism Media based activism/alternative media Official complaint letters and petitions Public campaigns Property damage/arson |
Impacts
| Environmental Impacts | Visible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Fires, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage) |
| Health Impacts | Visible: Occupational disease and accidents, Other environmental related diseases, Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…) Potential: Deaths, Other Health impacts |
| Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Other socio-economic impacts |
Outcome
| Project Status | In operation |
| Conflict outcome / response: | Court decision (failure for environmental justice) Application of existing regulations New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study |
| Proposal and development of alternatives: | In June 2016, the Palestinian Environment Quality Authority (EQA) filed a notification with the Basel Convention Secretariat about an incident of two illegal truckloads of hazardous wastes sourced from Israel’s Nitzane Shalom (Geshuri) settlement industrial zone that were caught en route in April 2016 heading to the Zahrit al-Finjan landfill (near Jenin). A 2011 Israeli state comptroller report provided that the industrial settlement (referred to as Mesila) is unauthorized and is constructed without building permits through the takeover of Palestinian lands. In addition, it is contrary to international law to even use this landfill for the disposal of hazardous wastes. According to the Oslo Accords, hazardous waste in the Occupied Palestinian Territory needs to be transported for appropriate disposal to an Israeli landfill because the respective Palestinian authorities have been restricted from developing an appropriate location for environmentally sound disposal of toxic wastes. In response to Palestine’s notification, Israel claimed that the waste was not theirs because it came from an industrial settlement. However, since responsibility for hazardous waste under the convention extends to ‘areas of jurisdiction’, this claim was dismissed by the Secretariat. According to the Basel Convention, a “transboundary movement” of waste entails the movement of waste from “an area under the national jurisdiction of one State” to another. Areas of national jurisdiction include “any land, marine area or airspace within which a State exercises administrative and regulatory responsibility in accordance with international law in regard to the protection of human health or the environment”. Israeli settlements are under full Israeli control as Israeli civil legislation regulates settlements authority institutions and applies extraterritorially to individual Israeli settlers. Following the mediated negotiation process provided by the Basel Convention Secretariat, Palestine succeeded in winning an agreement from Israel for the waste to be transferred back across the Green Line, to be appropriately disposed of in Israel. This is a significant victory for Palestine, demonstrating one possible way to use international environmental law to hold Israel accountable for violating the environmental and human rights of Palestinians and seek appropriate remedies. However, in accepting the consequences of its criminal actions, Israel has demanded that the case not be published on the Basel Convention website. Despite the lack of public disclosure about the case to date, it remains an important first step in seeking effective remedial action for environmental crimes committed by Israel against Palestinian communities.[3] |
| Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | Not Sure |
| Briefly explain: | The attempt at remedies, including a nuisance action, is on-going. |
Sources & Materials
| Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc) |
| |||||
| References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries |
| |||||
| ||||||
| Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network |
| |||||
| Other comments: | Look out for an upcoming publication of Environmental Injustice in Occupied Palestinian Territory, by Al Haq and Heinrich Boll Foundation. http://www.alhaq.org/publications/Environmental.Injustice.Report.En.pdf |
Meta information
| Contributor: | Environmental Justice in Palestine team www.ejpalestine.blogspot.com and Al-Haq Organization, [email protected] |
| Last update | 18/08/2019 |
| Conflict ID: | 1503 |
Related conflicts
Comments