Last update:
2014-08-18

Lignite mining Welzow-Sued II (Welzow, Proschim), Germany

Description:

In the south of Cottbus, the Swedish government owned enterprise Vattenfall wants to mine further 1900 hectares to extract lignite for its power plants. Over there, 204 million tons of harmful CO2 would be liberated. 810 people would have to be relocated from Proschim, Lindenfeld and Welzow. The city Welzow would be trapped on a peninsula and Lieske would be situated on a narrow strip between the old and new mining sites. From 2027 to 2042 this coal would be mined, and then a flooded Welzow lake of 1600 hectares would be created, which will be likely to be acidified like most of nearby mining lakes. In September 2013, over 120,000 objectors argued against the proposed Vattenfall lignite mining project Welzow-South II. Before the new election in September 2014, the Social democrats-left party government of Brandenburg wants to present a Cabinet decision to Welzow-South II. A broad range of environmental justice organizations (EJOs) are opposing the mining proposal of Vattenfall. The initiatives Kein-weiteres-Dorf (No more villages) and Allianz für Welzow (Alliance for Welzow) are local EJOs opposing the mine. These two have placed internet pages with informations. There initiative is supported by larger EJOS such as Friends of the Earth Germany (BUND), Robin Wood, Climate-Alliance Germany, Green League and smaller EJOS such as German Environmental Aid, Nature Friends Germany. Also other organizations are part of the initiative such as Brandenburg Farmers Association, Brandenburg Heritage Association. Protest actions have included demonstrations and writing of postcards to members of the Swedish government. As a reaction to the strong mobilization against this and other mining projects (see for example Jaenschwalde nord) in the region, the Brandenburg government is considering a nationalization of Vattenfall’s mining business. Furthermore, the recent decision of the German constitutional court (see Garzweiler II) has decided, that in the future, citizens must be able to file complaints against expropriations and resettlements at an earlier stage. According to Friends of the Earth Brandenburg and Climate-Alliance Germany this court decision will prevent Welzow Sued and other proposed mining projects in Brandenburg.

Basic Data
Name of conflict:Lignite mining Welzow-Sued II (Welzow, Proschim), Germany
Country:Germany
State or province:Brandenburg
Location of conflict:Welzow, Proschim
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Coal extraction and processing
Thermal power plants
Specific commodities:Coal

Land
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

20m tonnes of lignite per year, 204 tonnes of CO2

Project area:1,900
Type of populationSemi-urban
Affected Population:810
Start of the conflict:2011
Company names or state enterprises:Vattenfall Europe Mining AG from Germany
NUON from Netherlands
Relevant government actors:Brandenburg government
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Green League (Grüne Liga), kein-weiteres-dorf.de, allianz-fuer-welzow.de, BUND, Greenpeace
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
International ejos
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of mobilization:Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Referendum other local consultations
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Other Health impactsThe regions lignite fired power plants cause annual costs for human health and the environment of about 3 to 5 billion Euro altogether. In its communication to the European Commission
Brandenburg calls upon a significant fraction of pollution (on 57% of days when limits were exceeded) to originate from long-range transboundary air pollution, for example from Poland and the Czech Republic.
The air pollution action plan of the municipality of Cottbus from the year 2006 similarly estimates that about half of the urban pollution with particulate matter is actually due to ambient air pollution and not caused by local traffic. Ambient air pollution is partly caused by the lignite-fired power plants in the greater region.
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Displacement, Land dispossession
Outcome
Project StatusPlanned (decision to go ahead eg EIA undertaken, etc)
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Negotiated alternative solution
Strengthening of participation
Violent targeting of activists
Application of existing regulations
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Development of alternatives:No new lignite mining pits
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:The enlargement of the lignite open-mining pit Welzow-Sued II is not admissible according to Alliance 90/The Greens. This party claims to stop the planning procedures. The stake bases on a expert assessment of law firm Philipp-Gerlach und Teßmer from Frankfurt/Main.
Sources and Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

Brandenburg Constitution, German Mining law

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[click to view]

Gerwin, W., Schaaf, W., Biemelt, D., Fischer, A., Winter, S., & Hüttl, R. F. (2009). The artificial catchment Chicken Creek(Lusatia, Germany)—A landscape laboratory for interdisciplinary studies of initial ecosystem development. Ecological Engineering, 35(12), 1786-1796.

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

[click to view]

[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Excavated Away - Lignite mining eats into Brandenburgs villages
[click to view]

Grandpa Without Lobby
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Gabriel Weber
Last update18/08/2014
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.