Last update:

Marcopper Placer Dome Mining Disaster, Marinduque Island, Philippines

Flooded villages, toxic rivers, ill residents, children dying: The 1996 Marcopper Placer Dome mining disaster remains one of the largest environmental disasters in Philippine history. The fight for justice still goes on.


The first operations for the Marcopper mine date back to 1956, when the company Placer Dome Limited became active in the area by undertaking extensive geological mapping and drilling. Mining operations started in 1969 through the exploration of the Mt. Tapian ore deposit, containing copper concentrate, as well as gold and silver. At that time, the mine was co-owned by Placer Dome Inc. (39,9%) and its partner, the Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos [1;2].

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Marcopper Placer Dome Mining Disaster, Marinduque Island, Philippines
State or province:Marinduque province
Location of conflict:Santa Cruz
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Mineral processing
Mineral ore exploration
Tailings from mines
Landfills, toxic waste treatment, uncontrolled dump sites
Specific commodities:Copper
Project Details and Actors
Project details

Marcopper Mining Corporation, held by Placer Development Ltd. (former Placer Dome), operated two mines on Marinduque Philippines; the Mt. Tapian Pit and the San Antonio Mine. The two mines were under operation from 1969 – 1996. [2].

See more
Project area:4758.32
Level of Investment:>40,000,000 USD (=secured loan for mining development)
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:15,000 directly affected, much more indirectly affected
Start of the conflict:1969
Company names or state enterprises:Marcopper Mining Corporation from Philippines - mining
Placer Dome Inc. from Canada - mining
Barrick Gold Corporation from Canada
Placer Dome Technical Services Limited (PDTSL) from Canada - mining
MR Holdings from Cayman Islands
Relevant government actors:Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
Provincial Government of Marinduque
International and Finance InstitutionsAsian Development Bank (ADB)
Solidbank Corporation from Philippines - finance, banking
Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC) (RCBC) from Philippines - banking, finance
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Marinduque Council for Environmental Concerns (MACEC); Calancan Bay Fisherfolks Federation; Upholding Life and Nature (ULAN); Provincial Government of Marinduque; Kalikasan; Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM); Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines; Protestant National Council of Churches; Calancan Bay Villagers Support Coalition (CBVSC); Mining Watch, and others
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Local scientists/professionals
Religious groups
Fisher people
Forms of mobilization:Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Appeals/recourse to economic valuation of the environment
Refusal of compensation
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Waste overflow, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Mine tailing spills
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Malnutrition, Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Deaths, Other Health impacts, Other environmental related diseases
Other Health impactsblood intoxication by heavy metals and other substances (lead, cyanide) and subsequent deaths.
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..), Specific impacts on women, Violations of human rights, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Court decision (undecided)
Strengthening of participation
Under negotiation
Application of existing regulations
Project cancelled
Withdrawal of company/investment
There have been settlement processes between the company and the provincial government, but no acceptable outcome was achieved. The court decided that the provincial government may re-file the case in Canada.
Development of alternatives:The provincial government of Marinduque has filed a lawsuit against the company, demanding proper compensation for the vast damages as well as clean-up activities and a clean up fund. The provincial government of Marinduque further pursues a Moratoria on Mining on the Island in order to become a mining-free zone.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:The damages are vast and irreversible. There hasn't been proper compensation (if possible) or proper environmental clean-up.
Sources & Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

Philippine Mining Act of 1995
[click to view]

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[4] Sarah Beamish, Extracting Accountability: The Need to End Impunity for Environmental Crimes and Human Rights Abuses Committed by Canadian Corporations Abroad (New Haven, Ct.: One Justice Project, 2014).
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

[7] GMA News online (17/09/2008). SC tells RCBC to go after Marcopper: (accessed 20/04/2015)
[click to view]

[1] Socialwatch 2005. Marinduque mining disaster (accessed 20/04/2015)
[click to view]

[2] Mining Watch /Catherine Coumans. 2002. Placer Dome Case Study: Marcopper Mine. (accessed 20/04/2015)
[click to view]

[6] Business World online (25.03.2015). Mining-free Marinduque? (accessed 20/04/2015)
[click to view]

[5] Mining Watch Canada 2014. Philippine Province’s Lawsuit against Barrick Gold Could End Up in Canada. (accessed 20/04/2015)
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Video Documentary on the case “Bleeding Heart”
[click to view]

Other documents

[8] Marinduque Mining Tenement Map
[click to view]

[3] Historical Overview of and Updates on Mining in Marinduqe and its Impacts. Marinduque Council of Environmental Concerns (MACEC). 2005 (accessed 20/04/2015) Source:
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:A. Scheidel (ICTA-UAB) and Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM)
Last update18/08/2019
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.