MSPP was granted a permit by the Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) to establish a 38,000 acres (15,378 ha) oil palm project in the year 2011. The project is in an area marked by more than six decades of civil war between the central government and the Karen National Union (KNU). The preliminary ceasefire agreement, signed by both parties in 2012, brought an end to the massive human rights violation caused during the civil war. However, it also opened former war zones with weak land tenure to foreign direct investments, which have caused new negative impacts for communities and the environment. Located in an area under mixed administration of both the Myanmar government and the KNU, villagers are even more vulnerable to the concession development, as the two governments shift the blame and responsibilities among them [1]. 

The concession was granted in a non-transparent way and has caused large social and environmental impacts. The concession development did not comply with domestic law or with international human rights principles. No free prior informed consent (FPIC) with affected communities was obtained and the area was incorrectly classified by the central government as ‘vacant land’. This has led to severe conflicts over encroachment of indigenous customary land - the project area overlaps with agricultural and community land of four villages, home to approx. 4,480 people. Since 2011, about 6,000 acres (2,428 ha) were cleared by the company, including betel-nut and cashew orchards belonging to villagers. Loss of productive land has resulted in livelihood loss and increased debt levels as many villagers have been unable to meet their basic needs. Some were forced to become day laborers for low wages [1]. Money offered by the company to compensate damages was too little and many villagers refused the compensation [1,3].

Fertilizer and pesticides use have moreover caused water pollution. While some wells were constructed by the company to deal with the declining availability of clean water sources, some of the wells were soon polluted by animal feces due to poor design. Consequently, villagers reported livestock dying, skin irritations and dysentery. Furthermore, the company has been involved in aggressive timber logging, leading to deforestation and clear cutting of natural forests. To establish the plantation, high value timber stocks were first logged and retrieved from the area. Remaining vegetation was then burnt to establish the palm oil cultivation. 

The affected communities organized themselves, held large meetings and protested in many ways to show that they did not accept their land being taken. Religious prayer ceremonies were held. Several complaints were filed to the company, to KNU officers, to the regional government and to the central government, including State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. However, no meaningful responses followed. In February 2015, affected communities invited media groups to share their case and also met with lawyers to discuss their legal options. Villagers furthermore started to document in a detailed way their losses caused by the company. 

In March 2015, the KNU Mergui – Tavoy district issued an order to halt operations; however, the company continued operations. In April 2016, affected communities submitted complaints over the MSPP plantation to the Tanintharyi Joint Meeting Committee (JMC), responsible for monitoring complaints in the area. Following a subsequent meeting in July 2016, the Tanintharyi Township Police office sent a letter to MSPP, requesting to suspend operations temporarily. The company stopped further expansion. The suspension was a great achievement and offered an important opportunity to seek solutions in the MSPP land conflict. In December 2017, the Green Desert report (see [1]) was released through a collaboration of 12 civil society organizations. Based on 18 months of field work, the report detailed many of the concerns associated with the plantation. It was presented to the central government and received large media coverage.

As of early 2018, further expansion of the oil palm plantation has been limited by the authorities, however the remaining concession land has not been returned to the communities. Concerns over forest clearance and timber logging continue despite of the suspension. Negotiations between the communities, the company and the government are ongoing. 

(See less)