Last update:

Nam Mang 3 hydropower dam, Lao PDR

The comparatively small Nam Mang 3 hydropower and irrigation dam caused the first villager-led protests against the rapidly growing hydropower sector in Lao PDR


The comparatively small Nam Mang 3 dam, with an installed capacity of 40MW, caused an unprecedented protest by affected ethnic minorities, threatened to be displaced to make room for the reservoir. On November 22, 2002, some 40 villagers, armed with guns and sticks, marched to the construction site, urging contractors to stop the work and to inform villagers about the project, where they would be relocated and what kind of compensation they would receive [1]. According to International Rivers [1], this was the first recorded villager-led protest against hydroelectric dams in Lao PDR, a sector experiencing enormous growth since the turn of the millennium [2]; much of it due to Thailand’s involvement as contracted importer of Lao produced hydroelectricity [3;4].

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Nam Mang 3 hydropower dam, Lao PDR
Country:Lao PDR
State or province:Vientiane Province
Location of conflict:Namyam Village, Thulakhom district
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Water Management
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Land acquisition conflicts
Dams and water distribution conflicts
Specific commodities:Land
Project Details and Actors
Project details

The Nam Mang 3 Hydropower plant is multi-purpose project; it produces electricity and supports irrigation [5].

See more
Project area:1,000ha (reservoir size)
Level of Investment for the conflictive project63,000,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:2,745 people displaced; 6,000 negatively affected upstream; 6,800 people negatively affected downstream
Start of the conflict:22/11/2002
End of the conflict:31/12/2004
Company names or state enterprises:Electricite du Laos (EdL) from Lao PDR
China International Water and Electric Corporation (CWE) (CWE) from China
Resource Management and Research LLP (RMR) (RMR) from United Kingdom - consultancy
International and Finance InstitutionsAsian Development Bank (ADB) - The first feasibility study was conducted by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which later on stepped back from the project [1]
Export-Import Bank of China from China
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:International Rivers
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Fisher people
Forms of mobilization:Blockades
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Threats to use arms
Refusal of compensation
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity
Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Groundwater pollution or depletion
Health ImpactsVisible: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide
Potential: Malnutrition
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..)
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Strengthening of participation
Proposal and development of alternatives:Some villagers refused to be resettled, others were claiming adequate compensation [1]. NGO International Rivers urged to stop the project [1], as well as international donors such as World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank pressured Lao PDR to stop the project due to economic reasons [1].
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:The project went on
Sources & Materials
Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc)

Water and Water Resources Law, Lao PDR
[click to view]

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[1] International Rivers, 2003. New Lao dam Embroiled in Controversy: Report from a Fact-Finding Mission to the Nam Mang 3 Hydropower Project. (accessed 12/03/2015)
[click to view]

[2] International Rivers, 2008. Power Surge: The Impacts of Rapid Dam Development in Laos. Report (accessed 10/03/2015)
[click to view]

[3] Middleton, C. (2012). Transborder Environmental Justice in Regional Energy Trade in Mainland South-East

Asia. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 5(2), 292-315.
[click to view]

[4] Matthews, N., 2012. Water grabbing in the Mekong basin - An Analysis of the winners and losers of Thailand's hydropower development in Lao PDR. Water Alternatives 5(2), 392-411.
[click to view]

[5] Website of EdL - Electricité du Lao (accessed 12/03/2015)
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:A. Scheidel (ICTA-UAB) / arnim.scheidel "at"
Last update18/08/2019
Conflict ID:1865
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.