Last update:
2014-06-05

Pande-Temane Natural Gas Pipeline, Mozambique&South Africa

Description:

In 2008, the South African company Sasol, one of the biggest corporate carbon emitters in the world, applied to the UNFCCC for the right to produce and sell carbon credits. The company claimed that it needed a new source of fuel and had the option of choosing between opening a new coalmine and building a pipeline to the gas fields of Pande and Temane in Inhambane, Mozambique. However, Sasol had been considering building a profitable pipeline since 1998, well before the option of selling carbon credits was even on the table. Environmental organizations protested against this decision on the basis that the company had already planned to make this investment. According to SASOL the natural gas pipeline CDM project was terminated in 2010 based on diminishing returns brought about by increasing methodology requirements and concerns pertaining to our intellectual property.

Basic Data
Name of conflict:Pande-Temane Natural Gas Pipeline, Mozambique&South Africa
Country:Mozambique
State or province:Inhambane
Location of conflict:Pande
Accuracy of locationLOW (Country level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Oil and gas exploration and extraction
REDD/CDM
Specific commodities:Natural Gas
Project Details and Actors
Project details

In 2004, SASOL bought the rights from Enron to explore gas in Pande-Temane. The project includes a pipeline which runs from the gas fields in Pande-Temane to its Secunda plant in South Africa. This is a billion dollar project, supported by the Mozambican government, investors, and the South African state. SASOL pays taxes primarily through granting the Mozambican state 5% of the gas produced, as well by setting up socially responsible projects. The gas fields currently produce 147 million gigajoules of natural gas a year--well above the estimated 120 million. Only 3 million gigajoules are consumed by Mozambique. This goes primarily to large industries such as Mozal and Cimentos de Mocambique, as well to run a very small number of public buses (some reports estimate as little as 20 buses). The transportation of natural gas to local industries is operated by Matola Gas Company (MGC). This project has created around 700 jobs. Estimated emission reductions hovered around 6,4 Mt of CO2 --worth to R 1.1#billion a year.

Type of populationRural
Start of the conflict:2008
Company names or state enterprises:Sasol from South Africa
Relevant government actors:Empresa Nacional de Hidrocarbonatos , The Matola Gas Company, Ministry of the Environment , Ministry of Trade and Industry
International and Finance InstitutionsCorporación financiera Internacional (CFI)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Justica Ambiental, Earthlife Africa, Vall Environmental Justice Alliance, South Durban Community Environmental Alliance, Iniciativa de Transparencia na Industria Extractiva, Centro de Integridade Publica, Instituto de Estudos Economicos e Sociais
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityLOW (some local organising)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:In early 2009, the UNFCCCs methodology panel recommended that the project be rejected. The reasons for rejection inclueded poor proposals details, miscalculation of the emission reductions, and the lack of a plan for leakages. Environmental justice organizations had hoped for a stronger statement against companies that were patently manipulating the CDM system. At the time, Sasol was in the process of building three additional coal to liquid plants in Indonesia, China and South Africa. Meanwhile, the project itself continues and SASOL is expanding its reach in Mozambique. In 2010 the Mozambican government grants SASOL and the Empresa Nacional de Hidrocarbonetos a concession for oil exploration in Inhambane. They will have 8 years to explore an area of aprox 8370 km. In the event that they find oil, they will have a 30-year consession which will be split 90-10%.
Sources & Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

;jsessionid=OVVXNTXNDJEWPG5N4EZSFEQ?downloadtype_id=900001andrecordNum=1
[click to view]

Erion, G. (2005) Low Hanging Fruit Always Rots First, Centre for Civil Society, Durban.
[click to view]

Earthlife Africa (2009), Climate change, development and energy problems in South Africa: another world is possible, Johannesburg.
[click to view]

Sasol Annual report (1999).

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Earth Life
[click to view]

Tni, Sasol and CDM: The Developed World Pays Sasol to Increase its Carbon Emissions
[click to view]

Sasols greenwash - according to Earthlife Africa
[click to view]

Creamer Media
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Ruth Castel-Branco
Last update05/06/2014
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.