Projeto Caçapava do Sul, Rio Camaquã, RGS, Brasil

This project has found strong local opposition in 2017, against the wishes by Votorantim to explore for several minerals including zinc, copper, lead.


Description

As explained in (1), there was copper mining in this region some twenty years ago. Recently the Votorantim Metais Holding (currently Nexa Resources) filed an EIA - RIMA (Environmental Impact Study and Report) in Fepam - RS and held two public hearings to present the project to the population. According to the EIA of the venture (2016) the company has been conducting research on the site since 2008 and would have confirmed the economic viability of the extraction of metals. According to the website, this project includes the intention of exploring zinc, copper, lead, as well as silver and gold as by-products.

See more...
Basic Data
NameProjeto Caçapava do Sul, Rio Camaquã, RGS, Brasil
CountryBrazil
ProvinceRio Grande do Sul
SiteCaçapava do Sul; Santana da Boa Vista, Bagé, Rio Grande e mais 26 municípios.
Accuracy of LocationMEDIUM regional level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Mineral ore exploration
Specific CommoditiesWater
Lead
Gold
Fish
Silver
Zinc
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsIn a more recent period, in the middle of 2016, Votorantim Metais Holding filed an EIA - RIMA (Study and Environmental Impact Report) at Fepam - RS and held two public hearings to present the project to the population. According to the EIA of the venture (2016) the company has been conducting research on the site since 2008 and would have confirmed the economic viability of the extraction of metals. According to the website, this project includes the intention to explore zinc, copper, lead, as well as silver as a by-product, in Passo do Cação, a locality about five kilometers from Minas do Camaquã. The proposal is to export concentrates of the minerals through the port of Rio Grande to international markets such as Europe and China, or to take advantage of some of them in Votorantim Metals in Minas Gerais (zinc case).

The public hearings, which are conditioning activities for the implementation of the project, took place in Vila de Minas do Camaquã and in Caçapava do Sul in July. The municipalities of Santana da Boa Vista, Bagé and Pinheiro Machado were excluded from the consultation by Fepam, although the three municipalities limit the location of the project and could be impacted by the project. After the protest of community groups in the municipalities and with the intervention of the Federal Public Ministry (MPF), new audiences were promoted by the Foundation. Public hearings were held in Santana da Boa Vista, Bagé and Pinheiro Machado, where the miner also presented details and provided more information about the EIA-Rima. Soon after, the company's plans generated controversy in at least eight municipalities of the 28 municipalities that compose the Camaquã River Basin, which is the main watercourse in the region.

The mining company expects an initial investment of R $ 371 million and announces that it will generate 450 direct jobs with the installation of the project, with potential for generating indirect jobs. The project is in the initial phase of the analysis of EIA-RIMA by Fepam, with the expectation of starting operations in the first quarter of 2020. The extraction of open pit mining projects is expected to produce 16 thousand tons of concentrated zinc per year, 5 thousand copper and 36 thousand lead for 20 years. The company says it will not use a tailings dam.

On the other hand, organized groups and civil society actors (associations, city halls, self-organized groups and university professors), which we will describe in more detail below, are contrary to the establishment of the enterprise in the region. In addition to the possible contamination of the Camaquã River, the soil, the flora and fauna of the region, especially the lead concentrate, these organizations consider that if there was a greater investment in sheep production, since the region has more than 650 thousand sheep heads, to raise more than R $ 120 million. They also denounce that the great generation of jobs promised with the installation of these enterprises will occur outside the region, because the ores will be exported in the crude form. That is, the justification of the enterprise to settle in the region would be neither economic nor social or environmental, but it is only directed to the interests of the company.

Through the Port of Rio Grande it will drain the concentrate of metallic ores, including heavy metal Lead with high capacity of contamination (especially in children), and the community was not consulted or at least informed before the Public Hearing promoted in June of 2017, on the possibility of installation of this undertaking offer risks of contamination to the population and the environment by the sprinkling of ore particles in the air and water. It should be noted that several municipalities that make up the Camaquã river basin were also not consulted or informed about the socio-environmental risks that this venture offers, either because of the possibility of contaminating the waters of the Camaquã River, or by spraying particles along the truck path. will transport the concentrates to the Port of Rio Grande.
Project Area (in hectares)43,000
Level of Investment (in USD)109.101.000
Type of PopulationSemi-urban
Potential Affected Population1.000.000
Start Date01/10/2016
Company Names or State EnterprisesNexa Resources from Brazil - Projeto Caçapava do Sul
Votorantim Metais from Brazil
Relevant government actors*FEPAM - RS

*Secretaria de Meio Ambiente - RS

*Municipalities of Caçapava do Sul and Santana da Boa Vista in favor of the enterprise and other 28 prefectures

*Ministérios Públicos Federal e Estadual

*Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Pelotas (UFPel) e do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersAssociação para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Alto Camaquã (ADAC).

Comitê dos Povos e Comunidades Tradicionais do Pampa

ONG Amigos da Terra Brasil .

União Pela Preservação do Camaquã (UPP).
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
When did the mobilization beginPREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups MobilizingEthnically/racially discriminated groups
Landless peasants
Religious groups
Farmers
Social movements
Fisher people
Local government/political parties
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Local scientists/professionals
Industrial workers
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Informal workers
Pastoralists
Quilombolas
Forms of MobilizationCommunity-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Objections to the EIA
Public campaigns
Referendum other local consultations
Street protest/marches
Arguments for the rights of mother nature
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Food insecurity (crop damage), Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Mine tailing spills
Health ImpactsPotential: Health problems related to alcoholism, prostitution, Infectious diseases
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors
Potential: Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Other socio-economic impacts
Outcome
Project StatusPlanned (decision to go ahead eg EIA undertaken, etc)
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseInstitutional changes
Land demarcation
Negotiated alternative solution
New legislation
Technical solutions to improve resource supply/quality/distribution
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Project temporarily suspended
Development of AlternativesSustainable livestock and beef cattle production and rural tourism.
Do you consider this as a success?Not Sure
Why? Explain briefly.It is too early to say but it seems that the company cannot gain local consensus.
Sources and Materials
References

(1) Os debates sobre a mineração no bioma Pampa: conflitos socioambientais entre a

extração de minerais e projetos locais de vida e desenvolvimento
[click to view]

Links

Rio Camaquã - Chumbo Não
[click to view]

Lucas Rohan, Movimento contra mineração no Rio Camaquã completa um ano e conquista apoios. Novembro 19, 2017
[click to view]

Media Links

Rio Camaquã. Sim a preservação! Não a mineração!
[click to view]

(2) Conheça as histórias de 5 comunidades que derrotaram projetos de megamineração. Outubro 15, 2017. Professora da Faculdade de Administração da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) e coordenadora do grupo de pesquisa Organização e Práxis Libertadora, Maria Ceci Misoczky apresentou cinco exemplos de vitórias de comunidades contra a mineração (na America Latina).
[click to view]

Other Documents

Public Hearing of the Camaquã River Mining Project Risks - Rio Grande do Sul Legislative Assembly - ALERGS
[click to view]

[click to view]

Disclosure Public Hearing on Risks of the Rio Camaquã Mining Project - Rio Grande do Sul Legislative Assembly - ALERGS
[click to view]

Seminar For Life Against Extractivism and Mining in RS held on October 6, 2017, at UFRGS, presented some victorious cases of mobilizations against large mining projects. (Photo: Maia Rubim / Sul21)
[click to view]

Public Hearing of the Camaquã River Mining Project Risks - Rio Grande do Sul Legislative Assembly - ALERGS
[click to view]

Seminar in Bagé with residents and scholars to discuss impact that miner would have in the Pampa Biome region | Photo: Fábio Quadros / Sul21
[click to view]

Other CommentsThe company displays a progamme to seduce the local population: Programa Parceria Votorantim pela Educação (PVE), realizado em parceria com a Secretaria de Educação de Caçapava do Sul (2)
Meta Information
ContributorSearch group DIPEM - FURG - E-mail: [email protected]
Last update04/07/2018
Comments