Last update:

Protest against proposed relocation of Gaoqiao paraxylene (PX) plant into Jinshan, Shanghai, China

Protests against the construction of a new PX plant in Jinshan District, Shanghai have taken place throughout a week as frustration builds over plans to relocate chemical plants to the district.


There have been numerous protests in recent years focused on petrochemical plants that produce paraxylene, known as PX, a chemical used in making polyester fibre and plastics. China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of PX and polyester, vital for the country’s textile and plastics industry. PX plants are especially unwelcome in China because they release PM2.5, a particle which contributed to a higher rate of death than the amount of deaths from smoking, and to which deaths from air pollution are sometimes largely attributed. The first PX protest was in 2007[1], when over ten thousand residents of Xiamen in Fujian province ‘went for a walk’ to oppose the construction of a large PX plant near a residential area. Similar protests took place in Dalian in 2011[2], Jiujiang[3] and Ningbo in 2012[4]. In May 2013, some residents in Kunming marched to protest the Anning PX (paraxylene) Project[5], Chengdu residents opposed the Pengzhou Petrochemical Project [6].  But PX and other chemical plants have also become unwelcome because of large-scale injuries and disruption caused from plant disasters. PX plants have been the object of large-scale protests in the past, for example, where thousands demonstrated against the planned building of PX plants in Maoming, Guangdong in April 2014, protests turned violent with police actions [7]. The explosion of a petrochemical plant that produced PX in Zhangzhou, Fujian in 2013 and 2015 also led to the injuries of hundreds and the evacuation of over 30,000. [8] Of course, these incidents, too, were underreported on media.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Protest against proposed relocation of Gaoqiao paraxylene (PX) plant into Jinshan, Shanghai, China
State or province:Shanghai
Location of conflict:Jinshan
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Industrial and Utilities conflicts
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Chemical industries
Specific commodities:Chemical products
PX - paraxylene
Project Details and Actors
Project details

Sinopec Gaoqiao Caojing Integral Refinery Project: 20 million tons/year oil refining (15 million tons/year oil refining project +500 tons/year lubricating oil removal project), 100 million tons / year ethylene and its downstream supporting processing equipment

See more
Level of Investment for the conflictive project10,000,000,000.00
Type of populationSemi-urban
Affected Population:700,000
Start of the conflict:20/06/2015
End of the conflict:30/06/2015
Company names or state enterprises:Sinopec Shanghai Gaoqiao Petrochemical Co. Ltd (Sinopec Gaoqiao) from China
Relevant government actors:-Jinshan District Government
-Shanghai Chemical Industry Park (
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of mobilization:Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Occupation of buildings/public spaces
using the phrase 'take a walk'(sàn bù) instead of protest, march or demonstration
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Air pollution, Fires, Other Environmental impacts
Health ImpactsPotential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Other environmental related diseases, Other Health impacts
Socio-economical ImpactsPotential: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Project cancelled
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:So far it seems to be a success as the project is canceled according to many reports, but Sinopec Gaoqiao still needs to be relocated to somewhere due to its insecure aging equipment.
Sources & Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

王晶. 2007 年以来 “PX 事件” 的网络舆论研究. MS thesis. 南京大学, 2016.
[click to view]

[1] Controversy over planned paraxylene (PX) plant in Xiamen, Fujian, China
[click to view]

[2] The Fujia Petrochemical Paraxylene (PX) Plant protest in Dalian, Liaoning, China
[click to view]

[3] Controversy over planned paraxylene (PX) plant construction in Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China
[click to view]

[4] Controversy over planned paraxylene (PX) plant expansion in Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
[click to view]

[5] Opposing paraxylene (PX) plant in the PetroChina 10 Million tons/year Refinery, Kunming, Yunnan, China
[click to view]

[6] Paraxylene (PX) plant expansion in Pengzhou, Sichuan, China
[click to view]

[7] Violent protests against planned paraxylene (PX) plant in Maoming, Guangdong, China
[click to view]

[8] Opposition to PX plant in Zhangzhou and explosion accidents, Fujian, China
[click to view]

[9] Shanghai residents throng streets in ‘unprecedented’ anti-PX protest
[click to view]

[10] China Unleashes Police, Internet Censors on Anti-PX Plant Protesters in Shanghai
[click to view]

[11] Shanghai Denies PX Plans as Thousands Protest Over Pollution Fears
[click to view]

[12] The End of June in Shanghai
[click to view]

[13] Shanghai protesters fear chemical plant plan still on, despite government claims
[click to view]

[14]上海石化在线微博 Weibo Post of Sinopec Shanghai
[click to view]

[15] China Galaxy A-Share Research Key Ideas
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Jinshan, China - PX chemical plant protest
[click to view]

Shanghai Against PX protest parade June2015 上海反PX万人游行01
[click to view]

上海万人示威反PX之6月27日晚上 anti-PX protest shanghai (一)
[click to view]

Shanghai Against PX protest parade June2015 上海反PX万人游行02
[click to view]

[click to view]

Other comments:
Meta information
Contributor:EnvJustice, ICTA-UAB
Last update18/08/2019
Conflict ID:2782
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.