Last update:
2014-05-07

Quirimbas Community Carbon Project, Mozambique

Description:

Envirotrades Quirimbas Community Carbon is a Carbon sequestration project, located inside the boundaries of the Quirimbas national park, affecting agricultural communities in the Macomia, Quissanga and Meluca districts of the National Park. Some 95 000 people currently reside in the park and 30 000 in the buffer zone.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Quirimbas Community Carbon Project, Mozambique
Country:Mozambique
State or province:Cabo Delgado
(municipality or city/town)Quirimbas, Cabo Delgado
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Biodiversity conservation conflicts
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Deforestation
REDD/CDM
Specific commodities:
Carbon offsets
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

The Quirimbas Community Carbon Project is located in the Quirimbas National Park located in the six central districts of Cabo Delgado Province, Mozambique, and encompasses an area of approximately 7506 square kilometres, 5984 on the continent and 1522 ocean, intertidal, and island habitats.

Project area:750,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:95000
Start of the conflict:01/01/2008
Company names or state enterprises:Envirotrade from Mauritius
Relevant government actors:Agriculture Ministry and Tourism ministry
International and Finance InstitutionsEuropean Union (EU) - According to VC: "The European Commission contributed about 1.5 million Euros of financing to Envirotrade between the start of the project in 2003 and 2008, for research and testing in Nhambita. However the European Commission cut its funding, one of the reasons being irregularities observed in the proposed method for measuring carbon." [1]
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Via Campesina
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityUnknown
Reaction stageUnknown
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Forms of mobilization:Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Food insecurity (crop damage), Global warming
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow)
Health ImpactsPotential: Accidents, Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Malnutrition
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: displacement, Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Violations of human rights
Potential: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Land dispossession
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Institutional changes
Withdrawal of company/investment
The EC withdrew support for the project due to the irregularities observed in the proposed method for measuring carbon.
Development of alternatives:REDD is being debated in Mozambique. Civil society organisations are critical because of its focus on clean development mechanisms and carbon markets, and because agrofuel and monoculture projects are eligible for REDD+ and because it did not involve civil society from the outset and community consultations that have been carried out reveal themselves to be unrepresentative.

A position paper by VC states: “We repudiate and denounce the green economy as a new mask to hide increasing levels of corporate greed and food imperialism in the world, and as a brutal “green washing” of capitalism that only implements false solutions, like carbon trading, REDD, […] and all of the market-based solutions to the environmental crisis”[1]
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:Farmers and local communities know how to protect forests and how to grow food in a sustainable and agro-ecological way. However, Envirotrade says that the areas where farmers used to live and work are vulnerable and threated. As response to that, new ways of taking care of the forests or forms of forest management are being imposed. In this case, even if the propaganda is to protect the environment, there is no visible environmental justice.
Sources and Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

Carbon credits crisis for apartheid-era investors
[click to view]

The CDM Cannot Deliver the Money to Africa. Why the carbon trading gamble won’t save the planet from climate change, and how African civil society is resisting.
[click to view]

[1] Via Campesina Africa. Carbon trading and REDD in Mozambique: farmers 'grow' carbon for the benefit of polluters
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Envirotrade Quirimbas Page
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Boaventura Monjane
Last update07/05/2014
Comments