Last update:
2018-04-23

Sabal Trail Pipeline from Alabama to Florida, United States

The Sabal Trail Natural Gas Pipeline, currently under construction, covers three US States. Opposition stems from civilians and environmental groups, such as the Sierra Club, due to severe environmental impact. However, construction pushes ahead.


Description:

In 2011 the Florida Power and Light Company commissioned NextEra Energy, Spectra Energy and Duke Energy to construct a 515-mile natural gas pipeline originating in Alabama and traversing Georgia before terminating in Florida (Edelstein, 2016). The pipeline is intended to service the gas needs of the central Floridian population. Construction began in 2016, and although originally estimated to be completed in 2017, is now set to be finished in 2021. They have received approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as well as the Environmental Protection Agencies from the affected states to continue construction amid protests, as the states value the potential benefits of construction in terms of economic growth and job creation. 

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Sabal Trail Pipeline from Alabama to Florida, United States
Country:translation missing: en.countries.united_states_of_america
State or province:Florida, Georgia and Alabama
Location of conflict:Suwannee River
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Land acquisition conflicts
Oil and gas exploration and extraction
Transport infrastructure networks (roads, railways, hydroways, canals and pipelines)
Shale gas fracking
Specific commodities:Land
Natural Gas
Water
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

The pipeline transports 830,000 Dth/day. (A dekatherm (dth) is a unit of energy used primarily to measure natural gas. It is equal to 10 therms or 1,000,000 British thermal units or 1.055 GJ. It is also approximately equal to one thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of natural gas). (Wikipedia).

See more
Level of Investment:3,200,000,000
Type of populationSemi-urban
Affected Population:Residents of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida
Start of the conflict:01/09/2016
Company names or state enterprises:Duke Energy from United States of America
NextEra Energy from United States of America
Spectra Energy Corp from United States of America
Florida Power and Light Company from United States of America
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC from United States of America
Relevant government actors:United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Georgia's Environmental Protection Division
Florida's Department of Environmental Protection
Suwannee River Water Management District
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Sierra Club (https://www.sierraclub.org/)
WWALS Watershed Coalition (http://www.wwals.net/)
Seminole Tribe of North Florida (https://www.semtribe.com/)
Council of the Original Miccosukee Simanolee Nation Aboriginal Peoples
Wiregrass Activist for Clean Energy
Gulf Restoration Network (https://www.healthygulf.org/)
Flint Riverkeeper (http://flintriverkeeper.org/)
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of mobilization:Land occupation
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Street protest/marches
Property damage/arson
Arguments for the rights of mother nature
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution
Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity)
Health ImpactsPotential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…)
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Outcome
Project StatusUnder construction
Conflict outcome / response:Criminalization of activists
Court decision (failure for environmental justice)
Project temporarily suspended
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:No, because the project is still ongoing.
Sources and Materials
Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Sabal Pipeline Official Site
[click to view]

Adgie, Joe. (22 Oct. 2014). “Residents Protest Sabal Trail.” Valdosta Daily Times. Valdosta, GA. http://www.valdostadailytimes.com/news/local_news/residents-protests-sabal-trail/article_13bb8c22-59a2-11e4-8568-4bc4f8e58d1d.html. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).



Adgie, Joe. (27 Oct. 2015). “EPA Demands Sabal Redirect From Florida Aquifer.” Valdosta Daily Times. Valdosta, GA. http://www.valdostadailytimes.com/news/local_news/epa-demands-sabal-redirect-from-floridan-aquifer/article_3b1df28e-6794-5b75-a7d8-6c388d1d57c7.html. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).



Bluestein, Greg. (27 Oct. 2015). “Feds Deliver Blow to Proposed Sabal Trail Pipeline Running through Georgia.” Politically Georgia. https://politics.myajc.com/blog/politics/feds-deliver-blow-proposed-sabal-trail-pipeline-running-through-georgia/sodORfuXdvPcbd6xqJT7qO/. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).



Edelstein, Karen. (29 Nov. 2016) “The Sabal Trail Pipeline: A Sinking Feeling.” Fracttracker Alliance. https://www.fractracker.org/2016/11/sabal-trail-pipeline/. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).



Lipscomb, Jessica. (7 Mar. 2017). “Sabal Trail Pipeline will be an Envionrmental and Economic Disaster, Critics Warn” Miami New Times. Miami, FL. http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/sabal-trail-pipeline-will-be-an-environmental-and-economic-disaster-critics-warn-9188468. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).



Luscombe, Richard. (24 Jan. 2017). “Why a Protest Camp in Florida is Being Called the next Standing Rock.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/24/sabal-trail-pipeline-florida-next-standing-rock-controversy-suwannee-river. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).



Patterson, Steve. (14 Nov. 2016). “Gas Pipeline Project Headed to Suwannee River Leads into Georgia Waterway; Sparks Environmental Worries.” The Florida Times Union. Jacksonville, FL. http://www.jacksonville.com/news/2016-11-14/gas-pipeline-project-headed-suwannee-river-leaks-georgia-waterway-sparks. (Accessed on 22.03.2018).

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Miami New Times. Stinky Leaks From Florida's Controversial Sabal Trail Pipeline Scares Residents. Jessica Lipscomb | August 17, 2017
[click to view]

Shutdown averted for Sabal Trail pipeline. Ellen M. Gilmer, E&E News reporter. Energywire: Thursday, March 8, 2018
[click to view]

Other documents

Map of pipeline
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Emilio Mattiuzzo ([email protected]) and Megan Asher ([email protected]) under the supervision of Gabriel Weber ([email protected]).
Last update23/04/2018
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.