Last update:

Environmental defenders against Gmelina Tree plantations, Costa Rica

In the early 1990s environmental defenders opposed Stone Container's plans for Melina tree plantations, defending one of the most biodiverse zones of the country. This conflict is related to the death of four young activists.


As part of a national development program at the end of 1980s local governments from Southern Costa Rica (Golfito and Osa) signed an agreement with Stone Forestal Company a subsidiary of the US-based company Stone Container. The agreement consisted to plant 24 million of gmelina arborea or "Melina trees"  ( raw material for paper production)  across 24, 000 ha of rented farmland along the Southern Pacific Coast. It also included the permission for the building of a shipyard and a seaport to manufacture and export the material to the United States of America.  According to Stone Forestal, around 6000,000 tonnes of splinters would be cut and exported where they would be turned into film paper, newsprints, toilet paper or boxes. 

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Environmental defenders against Gmelina Tree plantations, Costa Rica
Country:Costa Rica
State or province:Puntarenas (Southern Costa Rica)
Location of conflict:Península de Osa
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Biomass and Land Conflicts (Forests, Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock Management)
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Deforestation
Plantation conflicts (incl. Pulp
Land acquisition conflicts
Ports and airport projects
Specific commodities:Timber
Paper pulp
Project Details and Actors
Project details

According to Stone Forestal the chip mill would have created up to 2,500 jobs, since workers will be needed in the factory and to plant and harvest.

See more
Project area:24,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:3000-5000
Start of the conflict:1990
End of the conflict:1994
Company names or state enterprises:Stone Container Corporation from United States of America - owner
Stone Forestal from United States of America - subsidiaria de Stone Container
Relevant government actors:Tribunal Ambiental Administrativo (TAA); Organismo de Investigación Judicial (OIJ); Sala Constitucional;
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Asociación Ecologista Costarricense (AECO); Coeco-Ceiba- Amigos de la Tierra Costa Rica; Federación Conservacionista de Costa Rica (FECON);
Supporters: Greenpeace; Rain Forest Action Network;
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of mobilization:Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Occupation of buildings/public spaces
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover
Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Global warming, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Soil erosion
Other Environmental impactsStone Forstal was aiming to send 168 trucks back and forth from plantations to the mill every day. The noise and pollution will disturb the wildlife.
Health ImpactsPotential: Accidents, Deaths
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Increase in violence and crime, Loss of livelihood
Potential: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Deaths, Assassinations, Murders
Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Strengthening of participation
Application of existing regulations
Project cancelled
Withdrawal of company/investment
Development of alternatives:-To continue with the small scale farming
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:The struggle against Stone Forestal in Southern Costa Rica represents a victory for the Costa Rican environmental justice as Stone Forestal left the area. It was won at a great human cost.
Sources & Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

Evolución Reciente del Ambientalismo en Costa Rica
[click to view]

"Guerreros del Golfo Dulce : industria forestal y conflicto en la Península de Osa, Costa Rica" autora: Heleen van den Hombergh.

Desarrollo Sotenible Centrado en el bienestar humano en Osa y Golfito, Costa Rica. Un análisis diagnóstico social.
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

[click to view]

An Environmental Test Case
[click to view]

Ston Forestal a manos ticas
[click to view]

20 años es mucho: autoridades tienen que rendir cuentas por muerte de ecologistas en 1994
[click to view]

¿Por qué se asesinan ambientalistas en Costa Rica?
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:ENVJustice Project
Last update07/10/2018
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.