Tanintharyi Nature Reserve conservation area funded by gas pipeline developers, Myanmar

The conservation area claims to compensate for the impacts of three gas pipelines, excluding however indigenous practices and failing to respect rights of people to return to their homelands.


The Tanintharyi Nature Reserve (TNR) was among the first protected areas in Tanintharyi region. Established in 2005 in Yebyu and Dawei townships, the conservation zone covers about 170,000 ha [1]. The project is funded by major gas companies that run three pipelines across the area and the main aim is to compensate for some impacts on biodiversity caused by the pipelines and support facilities. In relation to this aim, the conservation project is proposed to continue for the lifetime of the pipelines, at least until 2028 (see Project Details, below). 

See more...
Basic Data
NameTanintharyi Nature Reserve conservation area funded by gas pipeline developers, Myanmar
SiteYebyu and Dawei township
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level
Source of Conflict
Type of Conflict (1st level)Biodiversity conservation conflicts
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Land acquisition conflicts
Establishment of reserves/national parks
Transport infrastructure networks (roads, railways, hydroways, canals and pipelines)
Specific CommoditiesLand
Ecosystem Services
Project Details and Actors
Project DetailsThe Tanintharyi Nature Reserve (TNR) is a public-private partnership project developed by Myanmar’s Forest Department and several private companies that have constructed pipelines across the area of the Nature Reserve. The conservation zone was established through a ministerial notification on 30th March 2005 and covers about 420,000 acres (ca. 170,000 ha). Technical support was provided by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and the company ‘The Biodiversity Consultancy’ was contracted to document and review the project [see 2]. The Forest Department has the full responsibility to implement the work plans established for each phase. The partnership model is based on a voluntary contract between the partners and was developed independent of any clear legal framework [see 2].

The establishment of the Tanintharyi Nature Reserve is closely linked to the establishment of the three pipelines running through it. According to the consultancy report by The Biodiversity Consultancy [2], the budget for the protected area was 1.2 million USD for Phase 1 (2005-2009) and 1.2 million USD for Phase 2 (2009-2013), which involved the Motamma Gas Transportation Company (MGTC) pipeline from the Yadana Gas field and the Taninthayi Pipeline Company (TPC) that ships gas from the Yetagun field. For the construction of the third pipeline by Andaman Transportation Limited (ATL) - shipping gas from the Zawtika field - a budget of 1.8 million USD was announced (Phase 3 of the Protected Area development, 2013-2016). [see 2].

The MGTC company is a joint venture of Total Exploration and Production Myanmar, state-owned Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE), PTT Exploration and Production (PTTEP) and Chevron. The Yadana pipeline is operated by Total on a 30 years license and runs for 63 km in Myanmar before crossing to Thailand. 55 km of the pipeline are located within the Tanintharyi Nature Reserve (TNR) [2]. According to the consultancy report [2, page 21], the “Taninthayi Pipeline Company (TPC) is a joint venture of Petronas Carigali Myanmar Limited (PCML), MOGE, PTTEP and JX Nippon Oil and Energy. The pipeline is managed by Petronas on a 30 year licence”. The third pipeline is developed by Andaman Transportation Limited (ATL), a joint venture of PTTEP and MOGE. Of the 65 km onshore in Myanmar, 55 km run through the Tanintharyi Nature Reserve [2].

The Tanintharyi Nature Reserve consists of three zones [see 2]: i) a core zone (136,347ha), in which no villages, roads or whatsoever infrastructure is allowed, and access is restricted; ii) a buffer zone, in which subsistence activities are allowed, and iii) a Transportation Corridor where the pipelines, service tracks and metering stations are located.
Project Area (in hectares)170,000 ha
Level of Investment (in USD)4,200,000 (Phase 1,2,3)
Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Populationunknown
Start Date30/03/2005
Company Names or State EnterprisesTotal SA from France
from United States of America
Petroleum Authority of Thailand Exploration & Production (PTTEP) from Thailand
Motamma Gas Transportation Company (MGTC) (MGTC) from Myanmar - funding
Taninthayi Pipeline Company (TPC) (TPC) from Myanmar - funding
Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE) (MOGE) from Myanmar
PETRONAS from Malaysia
JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration Corp from Japan
Andaman Transportation Limited (ATL) (ATL) from Myanmar - funding
The Biodiversity Consultancy from United Kingdom - independent consultant for project review
Relevant government actorsNature, Wildlife and Conservation Division (NWCD), which is a division of the Forest department. The forest department is part of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation (MONREC)

Ministry of Energy

and others
International and Financial InstitutionsWildlife Conservation Society (WCS) from United States of America
Environmental justice organisations and other supportersConservation Alliance of Tanawthari (CAT), an alliance of seven civil society groups: Tenasserim River & Indigenous People Networks (TRIP NET)

Community Sustainable Livelihood and Development (CSLD)

Tarkapaw Youth Group (TKP)

Candle Light (CL)

Southern Youth (SY)

Karen Environmental and Social Action Network (KESAN)

Tanintharyi Friends (TF)

and others
The Conflict and the Mobilization
Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Local ejos
Landless peasants
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Local scientists/professionals
Religious groups
Karen, Dawei and Mon ethnic communities
Forms of MobilizationCommunity-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Public campaigns
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Food insecurity (crop damage)
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Other Environmental impacts
OtherPotential biodiversity loss due to loss of indigenous land use practices that are relevant for biodiversity (see 3,5)
Health ImpactsVisible: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide
Potential: Malnutrition
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Violations of human rights, Increase in violence and crime
Project StatusIn operation
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseMigration/displacement
Strengthening of participation
Development of AlternativesInstead of the current centralized conservation model that fails to protect the rights of indigenous, the groups call for conservation alternatives led by indigenous communities themselves: “An Indigenous Community Conservation Area in Kamoethway and plans to establish the Salween Peace Park are examples of this alternative model that promotes a people-centered approach to conservation, supporting local people and institutions to strengthen traditional methods of forest protection. This bottom-up model of community-led conservation is proving extremely successful both in Tanintharyi and other parts of the globe, signalling an important paradigm shift for conservation. Within this model indigenous communities can be recognized as the owners, managers and protectors of resources with positive results for both human rights and biodiversity conservation” [1, page 6].
Do you consider this as a success?No
Why? Explain briefly.The conservation area was established excluding and dispossessing customary and indigenous communities, as well as internally displaced people.
Sources and Materials

2012 Vacant, Fallow and Virgin Lands Management Law
[click to view]

1992 Forest Law
[click to view]

The Pinheiro Principles - Housing and property restitution in the context of the return of refugees and internally displaced persons
[click to view]

1994 Protection of Wildlife and Conservation Natural Areas Law
[click to view]

2012 Environmental Conservation Law
[click to view]

2015 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Procedure
[click to view]


[2] Pollard, E. H. B., Soe Win Hlaing& Pilgrim, J. D. (2014) Review of the Taninthayi Nature Reserve Project as a conservation model in Myanmar. Unpublished report of The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, England.
[click to view]

[3] Padoch, C., & Pinedo-Vasquez, M. (2010). Saving Slash-and-Burn to Save Biodiversity. Biotropica, 42(5), 550–552.
[click to view]

[1] Conservation Alliance of Tanawthari (2018) "Our Forest, Our Life: Protected Areas in Tanintharyi Region Must Respect the Rights of Indigenous Peoples".

[5] Eduardo Brondizio, François-Michel Le Tourneau. (2016). Environmental governance for all. Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 352 (6291), pp.1272-1273
[click to view]

Istituto Oikos and BANCA (2011) Myanmar Protected Areas: Context, Current Status and Challenges
[click to view]


[4] Mongabay article by Katie Arnold, 23 September 2016 "‘We are revolutionaries’: Villagers fight to protect Myanmar’s forests" (accessed online 23.05.2018).
[click to view]

Wikipedia on the Tanintharyi Nature Reserve
[click to view]

[6] Government webpage, Tanintharyi Nature Reserve. (accessed online 22.05.2018)
[click to view]

Other Documents

Conservation Alliance Tanintharyi (CAT) Report Cover Source: [1].
[click to view]

Tanintharyi Nature Reserve Signboard
[click to view]

Meta Information
ContributorEJatlas Southeast Asia Team (ejatlas.asia"at"gmail.com)
Last update29/05/2018