Last update:

The Jilin chemical plant explosions and Songhua River Pollution Incident, China


On November 13, 2005, an explosion at a petrochemical plant in China's northeastern Jilin Province resulted in the release of 100 tons of toxins into the Songhua River. [...] Much of the notoriety of the 2005 Songhua spill derives from the flawed response capability exhibited by central and regional state authorities. On November 26, representatives from China's State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) visited both the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) in Nairobi and the United Nations offices in Beijing to provide extensive data on the Songhua spill, after which SEPA continued to send regular updates to the United Nations. Although a decisive move on the part of the Chinese state, it approached the United Nations only after the pollution slick had reached Harbin, a full two weeks following the initial explosion in Jilin Province. While the central government went public largely because it could no longer keep information on the incident from its own citizens, it is perhaps safe to assume that this was the longest the Chinese government could wait without risking confrontation with Russia, whose border lay downriver [1].

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:The Jilin chemical plant explosions and Songhua River Pollution Incident, China
State or province:Jilin province
Location of conflict:Jilin city
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Industrial and Utilities conflicts
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Chemical industries
Specific commodities: Aniline, benzene and nitrobenzene
Chemical products
Project Details and Actors
Project details

Type of populationRural
Affected Population:6 killed, dozens injured, over 10,000 evacuated
Start of the conflict:13/11/2005
Company names or state enterprises:Jilin Petrochemical Corporation (Jilin Petrochemicals ) from China - Operator of petrochemical plant
China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC ) from China - Owner of Jilin Petrochemical Corporation
Relevant government actors:Former Premier Wen Jiabao, Former Minister of China's State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) Xie Zhenhua, Vice Governor of Jilin province Jiao Zhengzhong and Deputy General Manager of the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) Zeng Yukang, former Jilin Vice Mayor Wang Wei, Environmental Protection Bureaux of Heilongjiang Province, Jiamusi and Harbin, as well as SEPA Environmental Monitoring Centre, Heilongjiang Environmental Monitoring Centre and Jiamusi Environmental Monitoring Station
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Organization for Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance (OCHA)
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityLATENT (no visible organising at the moment)
Reaction stageMobilization for reparations once impacts have been felt
Groups mobilizing:International ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of mobilization:Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Oil spills, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Air pollution, Fires, Noise pollution, Soil contamination, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity)
Other Environmental impactsThe longer-term environmental consequences of the Chinese spill are unknown. Environmental and other groups have suggested that the food chain in the river basin and corresponding region could be affected for some time. The Times (UK) reported on December 21, 2005 that fishing in the area could be banned for as long as four years. Other articles have suggested that the benzene contamination could present a long-term problem in that it can bioaccumulate in the basin's organisms, remain trapped in river ice that will melt and result in additional releases, and become trapped in the river's sediments [3].
Health ImpactsVisible: Accidents, Deaths
Other Health impactsThe explosion severely polluted the Songhua River, with an estimated 100 tons of pollutants containing benzene and nitrobenzene entering into the river [4]. Exposure to benzene reduces white blood cell count and is linked to leukemia (ibid).
Project StatusUnknown
Conflict outcome / response:Deaths, Assassinations, Murders
Institutional changes
New legislation
Strengthening of participation
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:Among the policy consequences of the spill were a revision of the Water Pollution Control Act and an enhanced focus on emergency response. In the short term, the government took on a range of measures, including an extensive legal enforcement campaign in the spring following the spill. [...] In 2002 Beijing began to establish Regional Supervision Centers (RSCs) that answered directly to SEPA instead of local governments. Following the Songhua incident, the process of establishing the local EPBs was further expedited and prioritized, and both ADB and the World Bank are currently involved in projects helping the establishment of additional RSCs. At present the RSCs, which include a major center in Chongqing, have met with limited success, but they represent an important step towards a clear chain of accountability in the process of environmental protection, which in itself promotes government transparency. [...] [Moreover], SEPA has gained ministerial status in the Chinese government. Now known as the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP), SEPA was reorganized in March 2008 to greatly strengthen connections between regional EPBs and the new central ministry. [...] Lida Tan of the U.S. EPA notes that the reorganization of SEPA, while only announced in 2008, would have required extensive preparation beginning much earlier, perhaps placing the move's beginnings during the official fallout over the Songhua spill in early 2006. [...] The November 2005 Songhua spill [also marked] a moment of rare open dialogue between China's domestic and international media, state and local government officials, and a more general assortment of voices speaking through Internet forums, cell phones, and university bulletin boards.[39] As measures intended to control the spread and release of information failed, the government proved remarkably deft in responding to public criticism. Once opened, lines of communication with international and domestic environmental groups and media outlets remained so, receiving regular updates regarding the spill and efforts to control its impact. In addition to UNEP, the Chinese invited Russian scientific teams to take part in measurements and further work during the event's clean-up phase [Wilson Center]
Sources & Materials

[1] Positive Spillover? Impact of the Songhua River Benzene Incident on China' s Environmental Policy
[click to view]

[2] China blames oil firm for chemical spill
[click to view]

[3] The Songhua River Spill: China's Pollution Crisis
[click to view]

[4] China pledges to minimize impact of river pollution on Russia
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

In pictures: Harbin toxic leak (BBC News)
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:EJOLT team at School of Geography and China Centre, University of Oxford
Last update18/08/2019
Conflict ID:1737
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.