Last update:
2017-08-17

The retreat from Monsanto Bt cotton in Burkina Faso

In 2015, some seven years after Monsanto Bt cotton was first commercially cultivated in the country at large scale, a decision was taken to return to conventional cotton.



Description:

Burkina Faso is a major producer and exporter of high quality cotton.  It has gone through the experience of large scale planting Bt cotton provided by Monsanto, a GMO variety. Farmers had no much choice given the marketing structure for the cotton crop, its financing and inputs. SOFITEX (a state company) and two smaller private companies dictates what cotton farmers plant. Large scale planting of Bt cotton started in 2008, and by 2009, 128,000 ha of Bt cotton had been planted (1). Seven years later Bt cotton is being phased out after showing a marked decline in fibre quality compared to conventional Burinabé cotton. (1) In 2015 there were street demonstrations in the capital against Monsanto (5). By 2016-17 Burkina Faso, Africa's top cotton producer and the sole West African nation to venture into biotech farming, was phasing out genetically-modified cotton on quality grounds. The world's 10th largest cotton producer, with three to four million of its 19 million people dependent on the cotton, Burkina Faso said it was giving up Monsanto's GM Bt cotton because it had proved uneconomical: love price of the crop, and more expensive inputs. Burkina's Inter-professional Cotton Association, grouping the country's main producers and the national cotton farmers' union, is now targeting "100 percent conventional" production, announced Wilfried Yameogo, director of Sofitex, Burkina Faso's main cotton company. The goverment asked Monsanto to pay for the damage caused, and after some years an agreement was reached in 2017. The events in Burkina Faso have had an echo in India (Andhra Pradesh) where there are also criticisms against Monsanto Bt cotton (3), (4).

Basic Data
Name of conflict:The retreat from Monsanto Bt cotton in Burkina Faso
Country:Burkina Faso
Accuracy of locationLOW (Country level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Biodiversity conservation conflicts
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Intensive food production (monoculture and livestock)
GMOs
Specific commodities:Cotton
Project Details and Actors
Project details

In an effort to increase yields, the Inter-professional Cotton Association of Burkina (AICB) began introducing Monsanto's Bollgard II trait into Burkinabe cotton varieties beginning in 2009. Monsanto started getting juicy royalties (although the contracts between Monsanto and various Burkinabé institutions are confidential and the public cannot have access to them). The AICB, which groups together Burkina's SOFITEX and two other cotton companies, and the national cotton farmers union (UNPCB), believes the trait has increased levels of short fibers in its cotton, and reduced the ginning ratio, thus reducing its market value. USS 84 million (2) were claimed by the Burkina Faso goverment from Monsanto due to loses to cotton farmers because of lower prices of Bt cotton (shorter fibre) and more expensive inputs.

See more
Project area:550,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:3,000,000
Start of the conflict:2003
End of the conflict:2017
Company names or state enterprises:SOFITEX from Burkina Faso
AICB, Inter-professional Association of Cotton Producers of Burkina Faso from Burkina Faso
Monsanto Corporation (Monsanto Co) from United States of America
Relevant government actors:Government of Burkina Faso
Ministère de l'Environnnement et du Cadre de Vie
INERA, Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:COPAGEN
Terre à Vie
African Centre for Biodiversity
Third World Network
Foof First Information and Action Network (FIAN)
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
International ejos
Local ejos
Social movements
Trade unions
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of mobilization:Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Media based activism/alternative media
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Participation by Burkina Faso groups in the civil society "trial" of Monsanto in The Hague, October 2016
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Other Environmental impacts
Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Genetic contamination
Other Environmental impactsIntroduced resistance, "need" for more pesticides
Health ImpactsPotential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Other socio-economic impacts
Potential: Loss of livelihood
Other socio-economic impactsLow prices of cotton (because of bad fibre quality, compared to former breeds), and more expensive inputs.
Outcome
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Project cancelled
Withdrawal of company/investment
Proposal and development of alternatives:The government and Monsanto agreed to share the monetary loses, but Monsanto did not pay for the whole amount of the estimated liability.
A new international solidarity developed between cotton farmers and environmental organizations from Burkina Faso and Andhra Pradesh in India. Particpants from Burkina Faso were active at the Monsanto trial in The Hague in October 2016.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:For the time being, and at the time of writing (2017), Monsanto Bt cotton has been phased out in Burkina Faso.
Sources & Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

D. Glover, 2010, Is Bt cotton a pro-poor technology? A review and critique of the emprirical record. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(4): 482-509.

Dowd-Uribe B- and Schnurr, M. 2016, Briefing: Burkina Faso's reversal on genetically modified cotton and the implications for Africa. African Affairs, 115 (458): 161-172.

(1) Juan López Villar, Bt cotton in Burkina Faso. When theory does not match reality. TWN (Third World Network) and African Centre for Biodiversity, 2017, excellent report).
[click to view]

(3) The New Indian Expres, Genetically modified Bt Cotton: Africa’s Burkina Faso sets an example to follow. 17th February 2017
[click to view]

(4) The Hindu (Business Line), 17 Febr. 2017, What made Burkina Faso phase out Bt cotton. KV KURMANATH
[click to view]

Le Monde, 16 Febr. 2016, a general description of the situation regarding Bt cotton in Burkina Faso, and its phasing out
[click to view]

(2) Reuters, 5 April 2016. Burkina Faso seeks $84 million from Monsanto over GM cotton strain.
[click to view]

Reuters, 8 March 2017. Burkina Faso settles dispute with Monsanto over GM cotton, by Joe Bavier.
[click to view]

(5) Le Monde, 23 May 2015. « Les OGM n’élimineront pas la faim, mais nous les élimineront. » Journée mondiale de résistance aux organismes génétiquement modifiés (OGM), qui devait donner lieu à quatre cent quatre manifestations dans cent quarante-neuf pays, la société civile burkinabée a elle aussi décidé d’organiser une marche à Ouagadougou pour défendre sa souveraineté alimentaire.
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

For two years, over 500 farmers from the different cotton-growing regions in Burkina Faso documented their experience with Monsanto’s Bt cotton. This three-year farmer-led research initiative, called “Bt Cotton and Us: The Truth from our Fields,” provides an important counterbalance, as Burkina Faso was the first country in West Africa to adopt genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
[click to view]

Jeune Afrique. 23 May 2015. Environ un demi-millier de personnes ont manifesté samedi à Ouagadougou contre la production des organismes génétiquement modifiés (OGM) au Burkina Faso et contre la firme agroalimentaire Monsanto qui a introduit en 2003 au Burkina Faso, le coton transgénique.
[click to view]

Phasing out GMO cotton in Burkina Faso | Eco-at-Africa
[click to view]

Monsanto "Trial" in The Hague, 2016. Ali Tapsoba de Goamma was in The Hague with a full delegation from Burkina Faso. He took part in the People’s Assembly session “Attack on farmers and farming” while his colleague and farmer Ousmane Tiendrebogo was a witness at the Monsanto Tribunal session “Impact on farmers and the right to food”.
[click to view]

Meta information
Last update18/08/2019
Conflict ID:2967
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.