The hydroelectric power plant called 'Aimorés' is officially named 'Eliézer Batista'. It is operated by the consortium CEMIG (energy company) and Vale (transnational mining company). The hydroelectric power plant on the river Doce started to work in 2005, affecting 3 municipalities in Minas Gerais State: Itueta, Resplendor and Aimorés. An environmental conflict occurred due to the changes in the course of the River Doce, the flooding of an area larger than initially forseen, the neglect of the companies to the local practices and residents, and the non-compliance of the environmental license. The Itueta city was totally flooded and had to be rebuilt, not all residents were resettled nor compensated. Beyond that, the new town experiences frequent floods and the houses are cracking. In the Resplendor city the plant damaged the fishery, and a lot of species disappeared. And the companies have not resolved the sewage problem, one of the conditions of the agreement. Indigenous Krenak lands did not appeared in the EIA, the hydroelectric plant changed the ancestral fishing practices, and affected the Krenak`s sacred relation to the river. At Aimorés city, the fishermen and small farmers were severely affected. Subsistence fishing activity is not viable anymore, and plantations that served to subsistence crops were flooded [1, 2]. |
Name of conflict: | Aimorés Hydroelectric Power Plant, Minas Gerais, Brazil |
Country: | Brazil |
State or province: | Minas Gerais |
Location of conflict: | Itueta, Resplendor and Aimorés |
Accuracy of location | HIGH (Local level) |
Type of conflict. 1st level: | Water Management |
Type of conflict. 2nd level: | Dams and water distribution conflicts |
Specific commodities: | Electricity Water Land |
Project details | The HEP has a final installed capacity of 330 MW. Its a run-of-river project, the catchment area of the dam is 62,167 km2. The long term mean flow is 292 m3/s. The reservoir covers 30.9 km2 at the maximum normal water level (1). |
Project area: | 280,000 |
Type of population | Rural |
Affected Population: | 50,000 |
Start of the conflict: | 2005 |
Company names or state enterprises: | Vale (Vale) from Brazil - formerly named Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (Brazil) Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CEMIG) from Brazil |
Relevant government actors: | MPF - Federal Public Ministry, MPE/MG - State Public Ministry of Minas Gerais |
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | MAB -Movement of People Affected by Dams, APRAPUHA - Association of Landowners Affected by Hydroelectric Aimorés, APERDOCE -Fishermen Association of Resplendor City, Association of Residents of Itueta, Indigenous Community Krenak |
Intensity | MEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization) |
Reaction stage | In REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation) |
Groups mobilizing: | Farmers Indigenous groups or traditional communities Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Fisher people |
Forms of mobilization: | Blockades Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism Objections to the EIA Obstructing the railway till their demands are met |
Environmental Impacts | Visible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Food insecurity (crop damage), Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil erosion, Waste overflow, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity |
Health Impacts | Visible: Infectious diseases Potential: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide |
Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place |
Project Status | In operation |
Conflict outcome / response: | Compensation Land demarcation Court decision (failure for environmental justice) Court decision (undecided) Under negotiation |
Proposal and development of alternatives: | The affected people want their rights recognized and compliance with agreements. |
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | No |
Briefly explain: | The hydroelectric power plant is in operation and the affected communities are still claiming their rights to compensation. |
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries |
| |||||
| ||||||
Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network |
|
Contributor: | Andréa Zhouri |
Last update | 18/08/2019 |
Conflict ID: | 310 |
Images |
|
![]() |
Aimorés hydroelectric power plant
|