In 1999 the US company Bechtel was granted the concession to manage water services in Cochabamba, Bolivias third largest city. The cost of water tripled and it became necessary to buy a license to access water resources and a licensing system for collecting rainwater was also introduced. After a year, 55 percent of local citizens still did not have access to water. In April 2000, hundreds of thousands marched on the streets of Cochabamba to protest against the Government, and forced it to revoke the Water Privatisation Law. The contract with the multinational company Bechtel was terminated and the water service concession re-advertised. The conflict, known as the Cochabamba Water War, became symbolic of the struggles fought to protect common rights, proving that popular participation could have a major influence on decision making in regard to the management of public services. There is a long history of peasant protests in this region characterized by a permanent shortage of water resources. In this context, the privatization of the municipal water distribution company, linked to a water transfer called Misicuni project, infuriated the local population in 2000. At the same time, at the national level, regulation of the water supply and sanitation was influenced by World Bank recommendations and the so-called Washington Consensus. The public reaction led to the formation of a Departmental Coordinating Platform for Water and Life, which which grew until the symbolic occupation of the city of Cochabamba was brutally repressed. Then,in April 2000, the Coordinadora submitted the privatizing measures to a popular referendum. The result was 90% favorable to public management. Facing such massive and permanent mobilization, the government finally decided to give up on the privatization, giving the water management to the Coordinadora (together with the considerable debt of the company). Since then, water management in Cochabamba has a public character, and it has emerged as a successful example of social movements against the advance of the water multinationals. However, there remain serious problems of supply in many areas of the city, which have been mitigated through the creation of water committees which govern the use according to community traditions. Oscar Olivera, one important leader, published in 2004 (in English translation) Cochabamba - Water War. Cochabamba 2000 came to be seen as a turning point against corporate neo-liberalism. |
Name of conflict: | Cochabamba Water War, Bolivia |
Country: | Bolivia |
State or province: | Cochabamba |
Location of conflict: | Cochabamba |
Accuracy of location | HIGH (Local level) |
Type of conflict. 1st level: | Water Management |
Type of conflict. 2nd level: | Water access rights and entitlements Dams and water distribution conflicts Water treatment and access to sanitation (access to sewage) |
Specific commodities: | Water Industrial waste |
Project details | The increase in the water bills was of 300 percent. The average monthly water bill reached around US$12, while the average monthly wage was around US$60. percent of local citizens did not have access to water in 1999. |
Project area: | 28400 |
Type of population | Urban |
Affected Population: | 600000 |
Start of the conflict: | 1999 |
Company names or state enterprises: | International Water Ltd (IWS) - IWL was controlled by the American multinational company Bechtel and by the Italian company Edison - controlled by AEM di Milano, the Municipal Company of Milan, Italy. Today, the company operates as a subsidiary of Bechtel Bechtel EDISON International from Italy ABENGOA S.A. from Spain SEMAPA from Bolivia - public utility of the municipality of Cochabamba |
Relevant government actors: | Ministry of the Interior - Bolivia, Bolivian Army and police, Government of Cochabamba |
International and Finance Institutions | The World Bank (WB) from United States of America International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) from United States of America |
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | FEDECOR, Associations of Farmers, Students and Workers of Cochabamba, Movimiento Cocalero, Observatory on Debt and Globalization, Committee for the Defence of Water and Life (Cochabamba) |
Intensity | HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...) |
Reaction stage | In REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation) |
Groups mobilizing: | Indigenous groups or traditional communities Informal workers Local ejos Local government/political parties Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Local scientists/professionals |
Forms of mobilization: | Blockades Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..) Creation of alternative reports/knowledge Development of a network/collective action Involvement of national and international NGOs Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism Media based activism/alternative media Objections to the EIA Official complaint letters and petitions Public campaigns Referendum other local consultations Street protest/marches |
Health Impacts | Visible: Malnutrition, Deaths Potential: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide |
Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Loss of livelihood, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights Potential: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Increase in violence and crime, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures |
Project Status | Stopped |
Conflict outcome / response: | Deaths, Assassinations, Murders Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area Institutional changes Court decision (victory for environmental justice) Strengthening of participation Project cancelled The decrease on the water price. End to privatization of urban water services. Water as a human right. |
Proposal and development of alternatives: | 0 |
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | Yes |
Briefly explain: | The water prices became as low as before the water privatization. |
Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc) |
| |||||||||||
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries |
| |||||||||||
|
Contributor: | Lucie Greyl & Joan Martinez Alier |
Last update | 18/08/2019 |
Conflict ID: | 444 |