Name of conflict: | Hazardous garbage dumping and new waste-to-energy projects in Colombo, Sri Lanka |
Country: | Sri Lanka |
State or province: | North Western Province |
Location of conflict: | Kolonnawa, Colombo |
Accuracy of location | MEDIUM (Regional level) |
Type of conflict. 1st level: | Waste Management |
Type of conflict. 2nd level: | Urban development conflicts Waste privatisation conflicts / waste-picker access to waste Landfills, toxic waste treatment, uncontrolled dump sites Incinerators |
Specific commodities: | Land Domestic municipal waste Recycled Metals Electricity E-waste |
Project details | Colombo South Waste Processing Facility: Located in Karadiyana, this 12 MW WtE project consists of biological treatment plant that can process about 140 tons of high moisture content organic waste per day, as well as a mass burn plant that will process 500 tons of municipal solid waste per day in order to power 40,000 households. It is developed by the company Fairway Holding and expected to start operations in December 2020. The investment is of US$ 91 million. [14][18][20][21] KCHT Power Station: Located in Muthurajawela, this WtE project is expected to process 630 tons of municipal solid waste per day and is operated by the company KCHT Lanka Jang Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of the Korean KCHT Jang. The investment is of US$ 95 million. [14][20][22] Aitken Spence Power Station: This WtE project is expected to process 700 tons of municipal solid waste per day and is operated by the company Western Power Company Ltd., a subsidiary of the Aitken Spence conglomerate. Originally proposed for Meethotamulla in 2009, it is now built in conjunction with the KCHT project in Muthurajawela. The investment is of US$ 98 million. [19][20] The informal recycling sector: Besides providing numerous environmental services, Sri Lanka’s informal recycling sector supports thousands of families and plays a significant role in poverty reduction. It lowers management costs for local councils due to lower waste volumes and at the same time brings savings for manufacturing industries. Collected recyclable materials are either used by small-scale processors in the country (e.g. producers of household and industry items), or exported, as for example PET bottles to India. [5] |
Level of Investment for the conflictive project | 284,000,000 |
Type of population | Semi-urban |
Start of the conflict: | 1997 |
Company names or state enterprises: | Burns Environmental & Technologies Ltd (BET) from Sri Lanka - Operator of Bloemendhal landfill Fairway Holding from Sri Lanka - Incinerator operator in Karadiyana KCHT Lanka Jang (KCHT) from Sri Lanka - Operator of incinerator Western Power Company (Pvt.) Ltd from Sri Lanka - Operator of incinerator |
Relevant government actors: | Ministry of Megapolis and Western Development (MPWD) Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MENR) Colombo Municipal Council (CMC) Western Province Waste Management Authority (WPWMA) Urban Development Authority (UDA) Central Environmental Authority (CEA) National Government |
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available: | People’s Movement against the Meethotamulla Kolonnawa Garbage Dump (PMMKGD) Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ) Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) |
Intensity | HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...) |
Reaction stage | In REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation) |
Groups mobilizing: | Local ejos Local government/political parties Neighbours/citizens/communities Social movements Local scientists/professionals |
Forms of mobilization: | Artistic and creative actions (eg guerilla theatre, murals) Blockades Development of a network/collective action Development of alternative proposals Involvement of national and international NGOs Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism Media based activism/alternative media Objections to the EIA Official complaint letters and petitions Public campaigns Street protest/marches Refusal of compensation |
Environmental Impacts | Visible: Air pollution, Fires, Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Global warming, Soil erosion, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity |
Health Impacts | Visible: Accidents, Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide, Occupational disease and accidents, Infectious diseases, Deaths, Other environmental related diseases Potential: Malnutrition, Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…) |
Socio-economical Impacts | Visible: Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors, Increase in violence and crime, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Displacement Potential: Social problems (alcoholism, prostitution, etc..), Specific impacts on women, Land dispossession |
Project Status | In operation |
Conflict outcome / response: | Corruption Criminalization of activists Institutional changes Court decision (victory for environmental justice) Court decision (failure for environmental justice) Repression Technical solutions to improve resource supply/quality/distribution Violent targeting of activists Application of existing regulations |
Proposal and development of alternatives: | The Sri Lankan Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ) and the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) suggest Zero Waste strategies to be implemented and adopted in the national legislation [14][23]. Organizations such as the WIEGO (Women in Informal Employment – Globalizing and Organizing) and the Global Alliance of Waste Pickers (Globalrec) suggest a socially inclusive model of recycling, as already practiced in numerous cities around the globe – from Pune in India to Belo Horizonte in Brazil. Also Jayasinghe et al. (2009) call for an acknowledgment of grassroots waste management practices - such as from informal waste pickers – as these support livelihoods and contribute to the cost-efficient reduction of waste volumes and environmental conservation. [5] |
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?: | No |
Briefly explain: | Until 2020, 86 percent of Sri Lanka’s waste ended up in open dumps, of which only six percent are composted and four percent recycled [20] - while conditions there were hazardous for both waste pickers and the local population. The recycling rate is not likely to change to the better with the start of incineration. All mentioned dumping projects have been pushed forward by the governments despite public protests and often even with coercive measures against these. Sri Lankan waste management policies generally follow a “out of sight, out of mind” top-down attitude [5], while protests often follow the “not in my backyard” pattern [1][13], leaving the underlying patterns of waste conflicts unaddressed. With such unsustainable and socially unjust solutions, and waste being largely privatized and inadequately dumped, also the informal recycling sector and its role in providing livelihoods for the poor remains more and more sidelined [5]. |
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries |
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network |
| |||||||||||||||
Other comments: | * Video translation provided by Bandula Jayaweera |
Contributor: | EnvJustice Project (MS) |
Last update | 20/04/2020 |
Conflict ID: | 5014 |
Images |
|
![]() |
Villagers regularly faced waste water floods during rain season
(Photo credit: Indika Handuwala)
|
![]() |
Dump collapse 2017
(Source: AzzamAmeen; Twitter)
|
![]() |
Waste pickers at Methotamulla dump
(Ada Derama, extracted from a 2016 video report)
|
![]() |
Locals staged numerous protests, but faced strong police repression
(Ada Derama, extracted from a 2015 video report)
|
![]() |
Methotamulla dump contaminated soil, water and air
(Photo credit: Craig MacDonald)
|
![]() |
Demonstrations against Meethotamulla dump were held even weeks before the disaster in 2017
(Source: newsfirst.lk)
|
![]() |
Fire at Bloemendhal dump - troubles continue even 10 years after the stop of dumping
(Source: Ada Derama)
|
![]() |
Uncontrolled dumping at Methotamulla led to the emergence of an informal waste economy
(Ada Derama; extracted from a 2016 video report)
|
![]() |
Protests against dump in 2017
(Ada Derama; extracted from a 2017 video report)
|
![]() |
Image of the biological processing plant to be built in Karadiyana
(Source: dailynews.lk)
|
![]() |
Image of the biological processing plant to be built in Karadiyana
(Aitken Spence)
|
![]() |
What remains: Methotamulla garbage mountain in 2019
(Photo credit: Nazly Ahmed)
|