Please zoom in or out and select the base layer according to your preference to make the map ready for printing, then press the Print button above.

Thervoy SEZ, TN, India


Description

A Special Economic Zone (SEZ) has been proposed at Therovy Kandigai village in the Thiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu. The Village is located about 50 km northwest of Chennai the capital of Tamil Nadu [1].

The total population of the village is approximately 5,000. Most of them belong to Schedule Tribe and other so called backward classes. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) has acquired 1,127 acres of land in the village to establish a SEZ [2]. Acquired land of the village is a common grazing land used by villagers since long to rare their cattle, called 'meikkal poromboke' (wasteland). They also earn their livelihood from the forest products; especially in times of drought, when rice had become expensive, the villagers resorted to wild fruits and spinach that grew in the forest. For centuries, people are depended on the forest to graze livestock, fruits, herbs and firewood. So, it was a community responsibility to protect the forest which serves their purpose for long. The Thervoy forest is also of utmost importance for the local ecosystem as it's an important water catchment area.

The villagers as well as anti-SEZ activists have been protesting against this forceful acquisition of common land for years. The villagers are afraid that a stream of fresh water that flows from the forest through the grazing land will be blocked. The blockage of this stream will have serious consequence on irrigation and grazing of herds. Also, due to the construction in the SEZ, lots of trees have been cut and the area is fenced, the channel is blocked. This reduced the flow of stream also one lake in the area has been filled with excavated soil [1,2,3].

Since 2007 when the project was conceptualized, the villagers filed their protest to the concerned district officials, police, elected representatives, and SIPCOT several times. They staged protests and sit in for hunger strikes. Three thousand of them fasted in front of the Collector's office, who later showed solidarity with the mobilizers [3]. However, no attentions are paid by the concerned authorities and SIPCOT. Their peaceful movements are oppressed by the polices as well as district administration [1].

In 2008 the protest scaled up after the announcement of the French company Michelin's plan to open a tyres factory. Local residents and farmers fear such facility will pollute the waters and put a risk the surrounding forests. Other companies which will likely build in the complex are Aluminium and Ferrous Alloy Metal Maker Hunter Dougles India Private Limited, Harsha Float Glass and Harsh Exito Engineering Company.

In 2009 large mobilizations occured against the land acquisition, 61 villagers were arrested and jailed for protesting.

Legal actions have been taken against the SEZ; on May 12, 2009 a stay order was issued by the high court (WP 9319/2009). Judges Jyothimani and Sivagnanam ordered for a stay of demolitions for three months, but not a permanent stop to the SIPCOT industrial park and industries proposed. On 15-9-2009 The Gram Sabha of Thervoy Panchayat passed a resolution opposing the establishment of SIPCOT industrial parkresolution stating that they wanted they withdrawal of the establishment of SIPCOT Industrial park.

In September, 2010 Professor Lakshmanan , Associate Professor, Madras Institute of Development Studies completed a useful study “Environment and Social Impact Study of the Implementation of an industrial Zone: Thervoy village of Tamil Nadu ”, which confirmed mobilizers' concerns. In October 2010 an awareness padayatra was organized to 18 villages. Talks were held on the consequences to life and livelihood if the SIPCOT industrial park with the proposed industries is established. 400 people (150 women) took part in this padayatra, which spanned 32 kilometers.

From 16/2/2011 to 22/2/2011 hunger fast was held by 3000 women and men demanding the immediate closure of SIPCOT industrial park and the concerned industries.

In that same year, even false propaganda by Michellin Tyre company was put in place by an NGO but local mobilizers found that out and chased those guys out of the area.

In August 2010, the project was approved by the Ministry of Environment and Forest in condition that the project work should begin only after getting clearance from the state pollution control board. Villagers as well as activists claim that the construction began before the required approval from the State Pollution Control Board. The government has given a go-ahead to the SIPCOT project despite opposition at the public hearing [1].

Basic Data

NameThervoy SEZ, TN, India
CountryIndia
ProvinceTamil Nadu
SiteThervoy Kandigai; District of Tiruvallur
Accuracy of LocationHIGH local level

Source of Conflict

Type of Conflict (1st level)Industrial and Utilities conflicts
Type of Conflict (2nd level)Land acquisition conflicts
Specific CommoditiesWater
Land

Project Details and Actors

Project DetailsThe Special Economic Zone (SEZ) is proposed on about 1,500 acres of 'meikkal poromboke' (wasteland) at Therovy Kandigai village in the Thiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu. However, the land is rich in herbs, fruits and wildlife and also serves as a catchment area in this village. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) is responsible to develop the SEZ. A number of global Multinationals are going to start their operations in this SEZ. These include French multinational Michelin, Harsha Glass, Tropical Breweries [1]
Project Area (in hectares)405
Type of PopulationRural
Potential Affected Population50,000-1,00,000
Start Date2007
Company Names or State EnterprisesState Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) from India - Owner
Harsha Industries from India
Michelin from France
Relevant government actorsGovernment of Tamil Nadu, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, National Human Rights Commission

Environmental justice organisations and other supportersMovement Against Special Economic Zones in Tamil Nadu, Thervoy Kandigai women's self-help groups, Thervoy Girama Makkal Nala sangam, Dalit Mannurumai Kootamayaippu, National Alliance of People's Movements, Unorganised Workers Federation, Pennurumai Iyyakkam, Association for the Rural Poor

(some political parties also showed solidarity to the movements: AIDMK, DMDK , CPI, CPIM VCK, BSP, and MDMK)

The Conflict and the Mobilization

Intensity of Conflict (at highest level)HIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
When did the mobilization beginIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups MobilizingFarmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Informal workers
Local ejos
Landless peasants
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Women
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of MobilizationBlockades
Boycotts of official procedures/non-participation in official processes
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Strikes
Hunger strikes and self immolation

Impacts

Environmental ImpactsVisible: Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Desertification/Drought, Air pollution, Soil contamination
Socio-economic ImpactsVisible: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors
Potential: Increase in violence and crime, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Specific impacts on women
OtherCooptation of NGO sector by private companies [3]

Outcome

Project StatusUnder construction
Pathways for conflict outcome / responseCompensation
Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area
Court decision (undecided)
Migration/displacement
Repression
Strengthening of participation
Under negotiation
Violent targeting of activists
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Development of AlternativesActivists say that SIPCOT has acquired the land without the consent of the villagers. So they demand the industrial park should stop all construction activities and should be closed [3].

According to the activists, the companies which are located in the park have violated environmental norms.

Mobilizers ask that [3]:

• Immediate Closure of SIPCOT industrial park and the companies coming therein

• using the illegality of abiding by PRI resolution, when Gram Sabha has ruled otherwise,

• against the wishes of public hearing

• without proper pollution control clearance for SIPCOT industrial park and

• no evidence of agreement on handing of Mekkal porombokku land to PRI and JFM committee being cancelled

• AMPLE EVIDENCE OF LOSS TO OUR AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK, WATER, FUEL, HERBS, BODILY INTEGRITY

• Reestablishments of tanks, check dams and trees destroyed

• Dropping of all cases pending against men and women of the village, including false cases foisted by Michellin Tyre company

• Action against perpetrators of violence against our right to protest for our right to grazing land, forest, livelihood and bodily integrity:

• Compensation for loss of livelihoods, livestock, wounds and torture
Do you consider this as a success?No
Why? Explain briefly.Despite having gone through legal actions and many protests, local residents and supporting social movements did not see their demands beign implemented by the government.

Sources and Materials

Legislations

SEZ act 2005 india
http://sezindia.nic.in/writereaddata/pdf/SEZ%20Act,%202005.pdf

References

[2] A Study on the Perceived Loss of Common Property Resources (CPR) By Thervoy Kandigai Villagers, Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu.
http://archive.today/XPgR4#selection-415.1-415.130

“Environment and Social Impact Study of the Implementation of an industrial Zone: Thervoy village of Tamil Nadu", by Professor Lakshmanan from Madras Institute of Development Studies
http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/article298552.ece?service=print

Links

Anbulla kaadu (My beloved forest): Madhumita Dutta
http://kafila.org/2011/02/18/anbulla-kaadu-my-beloved-forest-madhumita-dutta/

[1] Village refuses to part with forest
http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/village-refuses-part-forest

[3] Tale Of A Village's Struggle For Survival
http://www.countercurrents.org/print.html

[4] Thervoy villagers protest against SEZ
http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/article37839.ece

Timeline of the conflict by Integrated Rural Development Society -IRDS (in Spanish)
http://www.agirpourlesdesc.org/espanol/como-hacer-respetar-los-desc/actuar-hacia-las-empresas/article/adquisicion-de-tierras-por-el

Multinationals Observatory, Was Michelin involved in human rights abuse in India?
http://multinationales.org/Was-Michelin-involved-in-human

Media Links

Anbulla Kadu (Beloved Forest)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzVw4gsc71Y

Other Documents

People near Chennai plan protest against industrial estate Source: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/village-refuses-part-forest
https://file.ejatlas.org/docs/17_12_.jpg

Meta Information

ContributorSwapan Kumar Patra
Last update15/07/2014

Images

 

People near Chennai plan protest against industrial estate

Source: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/village-refuses-part-forest